← Back to the statement
Statement grade
The average of Signal, Reasoning, Respect and Clarity. Reasoning rests on 2 conclusions, too few to hold the grade down. Average 90 / 100
Signal
69 / 100
View details Viewing ↓
Relevance
–
Not scored Viewing ↓
Reasoning
93 / 100
View details Viewing ↓
Respect
100 / 100
View details Viewing ↓
Clarity
100 / 100
View details Viewing ↓
A score under 50 is red. Choose a measurement to see where it lost points and why; choose it again to clear.
Procedure 24% Claims 40% The ask 14% The question 21%
Structure · 4 steps
Claims · 1
This view breaks the statement into its steps and names what each one does.
Procedure · 24 words However, Mr. Speaker, Canadians are demanding clarity from the government on its legal strategy and that the government stand up and defend private property, Procedure Claims · 39 words but the Liberals are putting private property rights at risk in Canada. In 2019, the Liberal government removed arguments to support fee simple private property rights in the Cowichan case.1 We cannot blame government lawyers for following ministerial directives. The ask · 14 words The federal government must ensure fee simple property ownership takes priority in legal cases. The question · 21 words Will the Prime Minister protect private property rights in all future negotiations and legal cases with first nations, yes or no?
Signal · 69
1 of 1 deductions are Signal
Signal checks whether every part makes a point, gives a reason, or asks for action. A low score means the speaker filled time with fluff, pleasantries, or attacks.
Procedure Throat-clearing: announcing what you are about to say, or the House’s routine business. What the tags mean → “However, Mr. Speaker, Canadians are demanding clarity from the government on its legal strategy and that the government stand up and defend private property,” Procedure or throat-clearing: no claim, reason or ask.
Relevance · no score
Not applicable: nothing to answer. Excluded from the average.
Relevance checks whether the speaker stays on topic and answers the question asked. A low score means the speaker dodged the issue.
Reasoning · 93
0 of 1 deductions are Reasoning
Reasoning checks for sound logic and solid support for any conclusion. A low score means the speaker made unsupported leaps or used weak arguments.
Nothing lost points.
Conclusions found · 2
Conclusion “but the Liberals are putting private property rights at risk in Canada.”
Because “In 2019, the Liberal government removed arguments to support fee simple private property rights in the Cowichan case.”
Conclusion “The federal government must ensure fee simple property ownership takes priority in legal cases.”
Because “In 2019, the Liberal government removed arguments to support fee simple private property rights in the Cowichan case.”
Respect · 100
0 of 1 deductions are Respect
Respect checks whether the speaker argued with people’s positions and records rather than attacking the people: insults, mockery, or bad motives assigned to them. Criticism of what someone did, however strong, is not marked.
Nothing lost points.
Clarity · 100
0 of 1 deductions are Clarity
Clarity checks for plain speaking, clear ownership of actions, and honest limits on certainty. A low score means vague promises or evasive language.
Nothing lost points.
Claims · 1
This list shows the factual statements you can check for yourself: the words as said, and the claim restated to stand on its own.
1 “In 2019, the Liberal government removed arguments to support fee simple private property rights in the Cowichan case” In 2019 the Liberal federal government removed arguments supporting fee simple private property rights from its position in the Cowichan case. search
