Analysis · Speech on a bill · beta

Claude DeBellefeuille

1331 words · 63 sentences · 85 clauses

Statement grade
B+
Average 82 / 100
A score under 50 is red. Choose a measurement to see where it lost points and why; choose it again to clear.
Anecdote 6%Positioning 16%Claims 55%Reasoning 11%Thanks 9%Procedure 2%Promise 1%

This view breaks the statement into its steps and names what each one does.

Mr. Speaker, Anecdote · 43 wordsbefore I begin my speech, I would like to add my voice to those of all women and the entire population of Quebec who, this week, have experienced yet another tragedy: the 10th femicide of the year in Quebec in just four months.1Anecdote Positioning · 7 wordsIt is incredibly sad. It is unacceptable.Positioning Claims · 17 wordsAs we speak, 10 women have been murdered by someone close to them simply for being women. Anecdote · 40 wordsAt the beginning of the year, I agreed to join forces with organizations whose primary mission is to support women, so that we can flag this very important message: The next one is still alive. I am joining their efforts.Anecdote Claims · 54 wordsYesterday, there was a rally in front of the D’Main de Femmes women’s centre to say that enough is enough, that this is unacceptable, 2and that the entire community stands behind all these organizations dedicated to standing up for the cause of women. There are also organizations that help men better manage their anger, Reasoning · 28 wordsbecause it is together, as a team, that we will be able to build a more humane society and also care for women who are victims of violence.Off pointVague promise Thanks · 36 wordsI would like to commend them and also offer my deepest condolences to the family of the woman who was murdered in Gatineau this week, the 10th woman to have been murdered in Quebec since January.3Thanks Procedure · 8 wordsI am rising to speak to Bill C-11, ProcedureClaims · 255 wordswhich is somewhat related to women’s issues. I think that sexual misconduct gave rise to this bill, which is almost the same as legislation that has been introduced before and which addresses serious needs. As my colleague from Berthier—Maskinongé said, the Bloc Québécois supports this bill. We have always supported any initiatives to ensure justice and to protect women in uniform who have been the victims of sexual misconduct and who have not always felt as though the military has been on their side since it did not take the necessary steps to look after them. Bill C‑11 amends the National Defence Act and other acts. As I said, the government already attempted to introduce Bill C‑66 in a previous Parliament, 4but that bill died on the Order Paper.5 As everyone knows, Bill C‑11 follows the recommendations of former Supreme Court justices Morris J.Unearned certainty Fish and Louise Arbour, who, in their report on the issue of sexual misconduct, made several recommendations.6 Bill C‑11 implements several recommendations, including recommendation number five from the Arbour report, with the aim of removing the Canadian Armed Forces’ jurisdiction over the investigation and prosecution of Criminal Code sexual offences committed in Canada.7 The bill also responds to recommendations made by former justice Morris J. Fish by modifying the appointment process for the three primary judicial or military authorities, namely the Canadian Forces provost marshal, the director of military prosecutions and the director of defence counsel services.8 The government would select these individuals rather than having the military leadership do so, Reasoning · 15 wordsand those individuals would therefore be immune to any form of blackmail, so to speak. Claims · 42 wordsThe bill now allows military personnel from the rank of private to that of chief warrant officer to become military judges.9 Finally, the bill makes other, less substantial changes, including the option for victims to receive help from a victim liaison officer.10 Reasoning · 31 wordsAs we know, when someone wants to report sexual misconduct, harassment or sexual violence, having a neutral party by their side to support them in everything they do is very important.Unearned certainty Claims · 24 wordsBill C‑11 has made it through a significant portion of the legislative process, including committee work, and it has been a lot of work. Thanks · 22 wordsI want to commend my colleague from Saint-Hyacinthe—Bagot—Acton for the tremendous work he did on making it possible to improve the bill.Thanks Claims · 17 wordsOn that point, the Bloc Québécois members are proud to have secured amendments that improved the bill. Procedure · 5 wordsHere are a few examples.Procedure Claims · 84 wordsWe added the option for victims to request that a trial be held before a military court rather than being transferred to a civilian court.11 We also ensured that the bill clearly stipulated that the government must draw up a plan to create an office of the inspector general for sexual misconduct in the armed forces.12 We also made a compromise amendment that is more realistic by allowing civilian authorities to transfer cases in accordance with victims’ recommendations, rather than imposing an automatic transfer. Reasoning · 33 wordsThis would allow for the resolution of contentious cases, such as when there are multiple victims or when transferring the case could jeopardize the possibility of a trial within a reasonable time frame. Claims · 36 wordsWe also succeeded in amending the bill so that veterans can be appointed as military judges and so that military judges are released from the Canadian Armed Forces.13 In the meantime, the government secured a majority, 14Procedure · 4 wordsas members well know.Procedure Positioning · 12 wordsI would say that there has been an abuse of this majority, PositioningClaims · 55 wordswhich was secured, as we all know, through floor crossers.15Partly on pointUnearned certainty The committee’s work was thorough. The committee listened to victims, who expanded on everything that Justice Arbour had heard and recommended.17 Victims spoke before the committee and their testimonies were used to form the basis of the amendments that were made to improve this bill. Reasoning · 14 wordsIt is understandable, then, that we see this as an abuse of the majority. Claims · 85 wordsThe government’s action is not consistent with what the Prime Minister always tells the media when he does interviews, which is that he expects members to be serious and thorough and that he does not want to see any obstruction. What we are seeing today is a bill whose amendments were completely thrown out by a majority government, which put them to a vote and disputed them. Because of the government’s majority, of course, virtually all of our amendments were defeated.16 Committees do serious work. Reasoning · 16 wordsIf the government can do without the work of committees, perhaps it wants to abolish them. Positioning · 14 wordsIf this is happening now, will it also happen with regard to future bills?Positioning Claims · 26 wordsAt the Standing Committee on Public Safety and National Security, we work in relative harmony. I would say that we are working to improve Bill C-22, Partly on pointProcedure · 4 wordsbut I have concerns.Procedure Positioning · 54 wordsI wonder whether I will end up working on amendments that go absolutely nowhere. Will I end up putting effort into a bill whose fate has already been decided by the government? Will the government reject every amendment proposed by the Conservative Party, the Bloc Québécois, the New Democratic Party or the Green Party?Positioning Reasoning · 16 wordsAs we know, our democratic system is designed so that the opposition can help improve bills.Partly on point Positioning · 88 wordsIn the case of Bill C-11, I think the government really missed the mark. I do not think it was really listening, and that is unfortunate. I hope this does not set the tone for all our work moving forward. I do not appreciate having my time wasted, and neither do most of my colleagues. We do not want to waste our time in committee deliberating, listening to witnesses, and then, in the end, not really knowing whether the government is going to challenge everything that had passed.Positioning Procedure · 2 wordsIn closing, ProcedurePromise · 16 wordsas I said, the Bloc Québécois will vote in favour of Bill C-11 at third reading. Claims · 19 wordsThe bill addresses a problem that was swept under the rug by both the Harper Conservatives and the Liberals. Positioning · 29 wordsEven though we agree in principle, we had to speak out against the government’s lack of seriousness when it comes to the democratic process in place in parliamentary committees.Positioning Thanks · 40 wordsI would like to use my remaining few seconds to commend the courage of my friend, Alain Therrien, who decided this week to pursue his political career by running in Quebec’s next provincial election and confronting the Premier of Quebec.18Thanks Positioning · 5 wordsThat is to his credit.Positioning Claims · 14 wordsWhen he sat here, he was a very active leader in our parliamentary lives.Off point Thanks · 21 wordsI want to join my Bloc Québécois colleagues in wishing him the best of luck and success in Quebec’s next election.Thanks

Analysed on