Analysis · Debate question · beta

Tamara Jansen

178 words · 11 sentences · 12 clauses

Statement grade
B+
81 / 100, held down by Signal
A score under 50 is red. Choose a measurement to see where it lost points and why; choose it again to clear.
Positioning 39%Claims 24%Reasoning 20%Procedure 2%The question 15%

This view breaks the statement into its steps and names what each one does.

Mr. Speaker, Positioning · 28 wordswhen the government forces Parliament to shut down debate, Canadians should ask themselves one very simple question: What exactly are the Liberals hoping that Canadians will not notice?Positioning Claims · 42 wordsThe choice to use time allocation is the latest in the government’s attempt to shortcut transparency.1 Debate is cut short, scrutiny is treated like obstruction and billions of taxpayer dollars are pushed through Parliament without good oversight. It is becoming a pattern. Positioning · 24 wordsThey change the rules halfway through the game, dim the lights and hope Canadians cannot see the scoreboard clearly enough to question the result.Positioning Reasoning · 24 wordsHowever, a strong economy depends on trust, trust that the rules are fair, the books are honest and hard work still gets people ahead. Positioning · 17 wordsUnder the Liberal government, Canadians feel like they are in a nightmare game, expected to play blindfolded.Positioning Reasoning · 12 wordsEventually, players stop taking risks, investors stop investing and builders stop building. Procedure · 4 wordsMy question is simple.Procedure The question · 27 wordsWhy do the Liberals keep shutting off the cameras and using technicalities like time allocation when the trust of Canadians is at its lowest? Honesty and integrity—

Analysed on