Analysis · Question Period question · beta

Pierre Poilievre

Conservative on Indigenous Affairs 2026-05-25

111 words · 8 sentences · 8 clauses

Statement grade

A–

Average 89 / 100

A score under 50 is red. Choose a measurement to see where it lost points and why; choose it again to clear.

Claims 60%Positioning 25%The question 14%

This view breaks the statement into its steps and names what each one does.

Mr. Speaker, Claims · 22 wordsthey are bragging that, back in 2017, they agreed that they would inform British Columbian homeowners that they might lose their property.¹ Positioning · 28 wordsBritish Columbians do not want to be informed that they are losing their homes. They want to be informed that their government is fighting to defend their property.Positioning Claims · 45 wordsThe hon. minister says they will debate it in the courts.² They are not debating in the courts. They have a guideline. The Prime Minister has a guideline on the government’s website banning federal lawyers from arguing that private property comes before every other claim.³ The question · 16 wordsWill the Liberals vote for our motion, reverse those instructions and defend property rights in court?

At a glance

Lost points for

Switch Claims on to list the checkable claims here.

What the tags mean

Signal · 68

2 of 2 deductions are Signal

Signal checks whether every part makes a point, gives a reason, or asks for action. A low score means the speaker filled time with fluff, pleasantries, or attacks.

Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it.What the tags mean “British Columbians do not want to be informed that they are losing their homes.”Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it.What the tags mean “They want to be informed that their government is fighting to defend their property.”Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.

Relevance · no score

Not applicable: nothing to answer. Excluded from the average.

Relevance checks whether the speaker stays on topic and answers the question asked. A low score means the speaker dodged the issue.

Respect · 100

0 of 2 deductions are Respect

Respect checks whether the speaker argued with people’s positions and records rather than attacking the people: insults, mockery, or bad motives assigned to them. Criticism of what someone did, however strong, is not marked.

Nothing lost points.

Clarity · 100

0 of 2 deductions are Clarity

Clarity checks for plain speaking, clear ownership of actions, and honest limits on certainty. A low score means vague promises or evasive language.

Nothing lost points.

Claims · 3

This list shows the factual statements you can check for yourself: the words as said, and the claim restated to stand on its own.

1“back in 2017, they agreed that they would inform British Columbian homeowners that they might lose their property”In 2017 the government agreed that it would inform British Columbian homeowners that they might lose their property.search
2“The hon. minister says they will debate it in the courts”The minister said in the House that the matter would be debated in the courts.search
3“a guideline on the government’s website banning federal lawyers from arguing that private property comes before every other claim”The government’s website contains a guideline banning federal lawyers from arguing that private property comes before every other claim.search

Analysed on 2026-10-20