Analysis · Question Period question · beta

Pierre Poilievre

Conservative on Indigenous Affairs 2026-05-25

121 words · 4 sentences · 8 clauses

Statement grade

A–

Average 88 / 100

A score under 50 is red. Choose a measurement to see where it lost points and why; choose it again to clear.

Positioning 4%Claims 33%Promise 21%Reasoning 26%The question 16%

This view breaks the statement into its steps and names what each one does.

Mr. Speaker, Positioning · 5 wordsthat is exactly the problem.Positioning Claims · 5 wordsThere will be an appeal, Promise · 26 wordsand we want to ensure that federal lawyers are, this time, able to make the arguments that the Liberal government banned them from making last time, ¹Vague promiseReasoning · 31 wordswhich is that when somebody has fee simple home ownership property, or when a small business owns a patch of land, there is no other claim that can supersede that one. Claims · 35 wordsThese are seniors who made down payments and worked for 30 years of their lives paying property taxes, and who toss and turn at night because they do not know if they own their homes. The question · 19 wordsWill the government reverse its disastrous direction, reverse its Liberal instruction and vote for our motion to protect property?

At a glance

Lost points for

Switch Claims on to list the checkable claims here.

What the tags mean

Signal · 94

1 of 2 deductions are Signal

Signal checks whether every part makes a point, gives a reason, or asks for action. A low score means the speaker filled time with fluff, pleasantries, or attacks.

Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it.What the tags mean “that is exactly the problem.”Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.

Relevance · no score

Not applicable: nothing to answer. Excluded from the average.

Relevance checks whether the speaker stays on topic and answers the question asked. A low score means the speaker dodged the issue.

Respect · 100

0 of 2 deductions are Respect

Respect checks whether the speaker argued with people’s positions and records rather than attacking the people: insults, mockery, or bad motives assigned to them. Criticism of what someone did, however strong, is not marked.

Nothing lost points.

Clarity · 71

1 of 2 deductions are Clarity

Clarity checks for plain speaking, clear ownership of actions, and honest limits on certainty. A low score means vague promises or evasive language.

A promise with no date, no measure and no one responsible.What the tags mean “we want to ensure”A commitment by the speaker’s side with no measure, actor or success condition named for how it would be ensured.

Claims · 1

This list shows the factual statements you can check for yourself: the words as said, and the claim restated to stand on its own.

1“the Liberal government banned them from making”The Liberal government banned federal lawyers from making certain arguments in the previous stage of the case.search

Analysed on 2026-10-20