Analysis · Petition · beta

Jenny Kwan

NDP on ROUTINE PROCEEDINGS 2026-05-25

150 words · 6 sentences · 9 clauses

Statement grade

–

Not graded

A score under 50 is red. Choose a measurement to see where it lost points and why; choose it again to clear.

Claims 92%Reasoning 8%

This view breaks the statement into its steps and names what each one does.

Mr. Speaker, Claims · 116 wordsI rise to present a petition signed by over 13,000 people about prolonged security screening delays for PR applicants.¹ Internal IRCC projections reveal that PR applications referred for comprehensive security screening are projected to take nearly 65 months, ²which is over five years, to complete. I have so many constituents who are faced with this problem. The petitioners point out that the applicants from certain countries of origin face indefinite, non-transparent delays, that these delays cause severe harm, including prolonged family separation, mental health crises and significant financial burdens, ³and that the applicants lack meaningful recourse or transparent case information.⁴ The petitioners call on the House for a number of measures to ensure accountability and transparency, Reasoning · 12 wordsso that people will know what is going on with their file. Claims · 22 wordsThey want the reporting of data and for an independent immigration ombudsperson to investigate chronic delays and provide a formal escalation channel.

Switch Claims on to list the checkable claims here.

What the tags mean

Signal · 100

Nothing lost points on Signal.

Signal checks whether every part makes a point, gives a reason, or asks for action. A low score means the speaker filled time with fluff, pleasantries, or attacks.

Relevance · no score

Not applicable: nothing to answer. Excluded from the average.

Relevance checks whether the speaker stays on topic and answers the question asked. A low score means the speaker dodged the issue.

Respect · 100

Nothing lost points on Respect.

Respect checks whether the speaker argued with people’s positions and records rather than attacking the people: insults, mockery, or bad motives assigned to them. Criticism of what someone did, however strong, is not marked.

Clarity · 100

Nothing lost points on Clarity.

Clarity checks for plain speaking, clear ownership of actions, and honest limits on certainty. A low score means vague promises or evasive language.

Claims · 4

This list shows the factual statements you can check for yourself: the words as said, and the claim restated to stand on its own.

1“over 13,000 people”A petition about prolonged security screening delays for PR applicants was signed by over 13,000 people.search
2“nearly 65 months”Internal IRCC projections show that PR applications referred for comprehensive security screening are projected to take nearly 65 months to complete.search
3“applicants from certain countries of origin face indefinite, non-transparent delays”The petitioners claim that applicants from certain countries of origin face indefinite, non-transparent delays.search
4“applicants lack meaningful recourse or transparent case information”The petitioners claim that applicants lack meaningful recourse or transparent case information.search

Analysed on 2026-10-20