Andrew Lawton

Mr. Speaker, Procedure · 16 wordsit is a great privilege to rise on behalf of the people of Elgin—St. Thomas—London South.Procedure Positioning · 39 wordsOftentimes, people who watch question period with the Liberal government in power will remark that there is a reason it is not called answer period. We often cannot get, in a 35-second sound bite, much substance from the Liberals, PositioningProcedure · 46 wordswhich is why I am glad to have the opportunity to take another crack at a very important question today. Those watching who are not familiar with what we call “late shows” in this chamber will remark that there are very few people in the House.Procedure Claims · 28 wordsThere are no journalists present. There is no one in the gallery. There is just me and the parliamentary secretary and a couple of other keen stragglers here. Procedure · 15 wordsI am hoping we can have a discussion rooted in the substance of the matter, ProcedureClaims · 20 wordswhich is that Canadians cannot afford life right now. Canadians cannot afford groceries. Canadians cannot afford the price of fuel. Procedure · 35 wordsThe question I initially asked in question period was about when the Liberals will commit to truly providing relief, not for Liberal insiders, not for consultants, not for bankers and bondholders, but for ordinary Canadians.Procedure Claims · 9 wordsCanadians cannot afford the price of gas right now, Reasoning · 31 wordswhich is especially germane in rural ridings like my own where driving is not, in fact, a choice. It is a necessity to go to school, to work, to medical appointments. Claims · 50 wordsWe put forward a very clear-cut plan, which was to get the Liberals to cut all federal taxes on fuel for the entirety of the year, as a starting point. Instead, the Liberals responded by saying they would cut a third of the taxes for a third of the year.¹ Positioning · 9 wordsSomething is better than nothing, but not that much.Positioning Claims · 40 wordsWhen we talked about this in recent weeks, some Liberals asked, “Well, where are you going to get the money for that from?” The Liberals will often say that any tax cut has to come at the expense of services, Reasoning · 21 wordsbut that is a red herring that is rooted in a fundamental misrepresentation of what the Liberals have prioritized spending on. Procedure · 11 wordsI would like to mention a couple of those things here.Procedure Claims · 194 wordsThe Liberals are committing $90 billion to an Alto rail project that Canadians do not want and that will not benefit people in the majority of the country, certainly not people in southwestern Ontario.² They are spending $742 billion on a firearms confiscation scheme that law enforcement has said will not improve public safety.³⁴ Federal bureaucracy spending is expected to reach $66 billion this year.⁵ It has grown in the last year, outpacing inflation and outpacing the rise in the population of this country. Debt interest is $58.7 billion.⁶ That is money paying the interest payments on the federal credit card. Then we found out, of course, that the Liberals are spending $200 million on a launch pad.⁷ That is what they call it, but it is actually a gravel pit in Nova Scotia. It is on provincial government land, yet they are paying this to insider-connected companies as part of this ambitious Liberal space strategy that Canadians cannot afford in the way they are presenting it. They are spending $13 billion for Build Canada Homes, a housing bureaucracy with no track record of actually building homes, along with $20 billion on external consultants.⁸⁹ Reasoning · 27 wordsAll of this could go away and fund a fuel tax reduction for Canadians and a significant other suite of relief measures without affecting services at all. The question · 42 wordsMy question is, why are the Liberals not doing this? Why are they not looking inside themselves, as the Prime Minister has said to some people in the past, and finding ways to save money, which is not theirs but the taxpayers’?