Analysis · Debate reply · beta

Randy Hoback

189 words · 16 sentences · 19 clauses

Replying to Mario Beaulieu (Bloc Québécois)
“Mr. Speaker, the Parliamentary Budget Officer found that cutting taxes on fuel, such as the excise tax, mainly benefits the wealthiest Canadians, who use more gas. Over time, oil companies tend to raise their prices to increase their profit margins. What does my colleague think about that?”
Statement grade
A
Average 94 / 100
A score under 50 is red. Choose a measurement to see where it lost points and why; choose it again to clear.
Procedure 6%Claims 50%Reasoning 44%

This view breaks the statement into its steps and names what each one does.

Mr. Speaker, Procedure · 8 wordsI understand where the member is coming from.Procedure Claims · 95 wordsActually, it depends on the demographics. If someone is in rural Saskatchewan, they are not wealthy, by any means. They are a hard-working family with a middle-class income. Reducing fuel costs for them makes a difference. They do drive. If they are going for groceries, they are driving 50 kilometres one way.1 That is the reality in Saskatchewan.Unearned certainty It may be different in Quebec. I do understand that maybe there are different requirements in Quebec, as there are for a lot of other things for which Quebec has different requirements than the rest of Canada. Procedure · 3 wordsI acknowledge that.Procedure Reasoning · 83 wordsHere is something very simple for rural people in rural Canada that would benefit them immediately. It would. For somebody in downtown Toronto or downtown Montreal who takes the bus to work, maybe the benefit is not there. Maybe they need something different. If we could let people keep more of their money, Vague promiseor, in this situation, if we get rid of the clean fuel standard so that the cost of what they are buying is cheaper, then they will feel that benefit.

Analysed on