Mark Gerretsen

Mr. Speaker, Thanks · 25 wordsI want to thank the member for University—Rosedale for sharing her time with me today to debate the opposition motion that we have before us.¹¹Thanks Procedure · 34 wordsI think I will focus my 10 minutes primarily on the exchange that took place earlier between the member for Swift Current—Grasslands—Kindersley and the Leader of the Opposition. They had a really interesting exchange.Procedure Claims · 30 wordsThe member had asked the Leader of the Opposition to talk about all that this would do for low-income Canadians and how it would benefit them more than anybody else. Positioning · 15 wordsI could not quite wrap my head around where that question was even coming from, PositioningClaims · 41 wordsbecause the reality of the situation is that we know that people who are wealthier consume a lot more energy.Unearned certainty I mean, they have bigger homes and drive bigger vehicles, and they have other recreational vehicles and toys that require fuel. Positioning · 49 wordsThis idea that the impact is going to be more substantial on low-income Canadians than on Canadians who are much more well off is just absolutely ludicrous to me. It does not make any sense, but it does fit perfectly into the narrative that Conservatives always try to paint.Positioning Claims · 73 wordsThis takes me back to the Ronald Reagan Republicans and the Margaret Thatchers of the eighties and their trickle-down economics, where we were told not to worry, that if we give relief to the wealthy, that money will slowly trickle down to the folks who really need it. That is a Conservative myth that has never been proven. There is not a single data point that has actually proven that to be true. Positioning · 69 wordsIt is just what Conservatives like to get up here to say day after day. When I am sitting here, listening to the member for Swift Current—Grasslands—Kindersley and the Leader of the Opposition talk about how removing more tax off of fuel is somehow going to benefit the less fortunate in our society more than the ultrawealthy, I just think it is absolutely crazy to even make that claim.Positioning Procedure · 39 wordsIf we want to talk about what actually helps people who really need help, I will tell the House about some of the initiatives that the government has brought in.⁶ I ask the folks watching this from the gallery, ProcedureClaims · 98 wordsor folks at home who might be tuning in to this, to consider that members of the Conservative Party of Canada have voted against every single one of these initiatives. When we introduced the Canada groceries and essentials benefit, Conservatives voted against it.¹ This is money that is specifically targeted to go to the low-income Canadians who the member for Swift Current—Grasslands—Kindersley was talking about. Conservatives voted against cutting taxes for 22 million Canadians.⁴ These are initiatives that affected the lowest-income earners the most by removing the biggest amount of tax implication from them rather than anybody else. Positioning · 32 wordsIt is not appealing to the Conservatives because it does not fit the narrative that they can sell back to the base, those who they are really trying to impress, the ultrawealthy.Positioning Procedure · 8 wordsBy the way, that brings up something else.Procedure Thanks · 11 wordsI want to applaud the Bloc for actually discussing this today.Thanks Claims · 85 wordsThe Bloc raised the point on a couple of occasions that the Conservatives are talking about high oil and gas prices, but we have not heard them, in one breath, in one sentence or even in three words, talk about the fact that it is the oil and gas industry that is making massive record profits right now. I have not seen the Conservatives bringing in motions to talk about what we should do about that or how taxes should be impacting those particular companies. Positioning · 61 wordsOf course not. They are never going to do that. That is their base. That is who they are always really trying to impress and please, unlike what was in the fake conversation I heard earlier between the member for Swift Current—Grasslands—Kindersley and the Leader of the Opposition about suddenly having an interest in helping the less fortunate in our communities.Positioning Claims · 9 wordsWe also brought in a national school food program, ¹⁵Positioning · 5 wordsand the Conservatives vilified it.Positioning Claims · 100 wordsThey not only voted against it, ²but also got up in the House to talk about how it is a fake program that has not helped anybody.⁵ The member for York—Durham goes on his “Restore the North” tour, asking why we need to give food to children and saying what we really needed to do, all while making up these fake reasons why it was required, while of course neglecting the fact that we were the last of the G7 countries to bring in a national school food program.¹² National food programs have been going on for decades and decades. Positioning · 37 wordsOf course, the Conservatives will take every opportunity to take every single issue and politicize it. They cannot even resist the temptation of politicizing putting food into children’s bellies in elementary school. They politicize all of it.Positioning An hon. member: Oh, oh! Hon. Mark Gerretsen: Positioning · 6 wordsNo, I am not politicizing it.Positioning Mr. Speaker, Positioning · 9 wordsI am listening to these guys heckle right now, PositioningProcedure · 7 wordsand I will respond to that heckle.Procedure Claims · 56 wordsI stood up here for days, for years, asking why we were the last of the G7 countries to do this and why we had not done it yet. I worked internally in my caucus to push the minister of finance at the time, and I presented petition after petition from my community on this issue, Positioning · 56 wordsso no, I am not going to jump onto an issue on a case-by-case basis for three minutes so that I can politicize it like the Conservatives do. That would be just like what I have to listen to in the House when they suddenly become the champions of those with low incomes in our society.Positioning Claims · 59 wordsWe introduced automatic federal benefits in our budget, something the Conservatives voted against. Now low-income Canadians whose tax returns are very simple can benefit from it being an automatic process so they immediately get the tax refund. They do not need an accountant or to go to a third-party company and pay for it. That is helping low-income Canadians. Positioning · 12 wordsConservatives are not helping when they are getting up and saying that, PositioningClaims · 39 wordsif we reduce the gas tax even more than we have already, it would help low-income Canadians more than the wealthy Canadians, who obviously consume way more fuel than low-income Canadians. We expanded and entrenched the Canada child benefit.¹⁶ Reasoning · 26 wordsIf members want one clear example of a difference in policy between the Liberals and Conservatives, they need look no further than the Canada child benefit. Claims · 141 wordsAll they have to do is compare two very easy policies, one presented by the Conservatives under Stephen Harper and one presented by the Liberals. The goal was ultimately the same, which was to give money to help support children. The key difference between the two is that Stephen Harper’s universal child care benefit gave a cheque for every single child.⁷ If a person had three kids, they got three times the individual child amount.⁸ It did not matter whether they were making $20,000 a year or $2 million a year.⁹ Everybody got the exact same cheque.¹⁰ When we came along we said that it might make more sense to not give cheques to millionaires, but instead take that money and give more to low-income Canadians, who would use the money right away and inject it right back into our economy. Reasoning · 60 wordsIf Canadians want just one example of a fundamental difference in the philosophy behind the policies of the Liberals and the Conservatives, all they need to do is look at the two different child care benefits that were introduced under the two different governments. That tells them everything they need to know about the differences between the Liberals and Conservatives. Claims · 36 wordsOf course, there is the $10-a-day child care benefit that we have been working with the provinces on.¹³ There is also the Canada dental plan that the member for Regina—Lewvan did not vote in favour of.³ An hon. member: Oh, oh! Hon. Mark Gerretsen: Claims · 48 wordsMr. Speaker, the member is saying that, no, he did not vote in favour of it. I am sure I could get the Minister of Health to tell me how many recipients there have been in his riding. The member is saying that they do not need it. Positioning · 6 wordsWhy would they not need it?Positioning Claims · 10 wordsWe are one of the wealthiest countries in the world, Positioning · 35 wordsand the member for Regina—Lewvan does not want to provide dental care to some of the most vulnerable people in our communities. This is everything anyone needs to understand the difference between the two parties.Positioning Thanks · 9 wordsI want to thank him for speaking up there.Thanks Claims · 48 wordsThe Canada disability benefit is another one, ¹⁷as well as the $500 Canada housing benefit top-up for low-income renters.¹⁴ These are all initiatives that the government has brought forward to make the lives of the most vulnerable Canadians better. Every single one of these, the Conservatives voted against.