Analysis · Question Period question · beta

Dan Albas

Conservative on Business of the House 2026-05-26

107 words · 4 sentences · 7 clauses

Statement grade

A+

Average 100 / 100

A score under 50 is red. Choose a measurement to see where it lost points and why; choose it again to clear.

The question 44%Claims 17%Reasoning 39%

This view breaks the statement into its steps and names what each one does.

Mr. Speaker, The question · 19 wordsduring question period, you suggested that I should be using the proper title of a minister or a member.¹ Claims · 18 wordsIn my comments, if you review the tapes, I did quite rightly refer to the Minister of Transport.² Reasoning · 42 wordsI understand you did not like, or maybe the Liberals did not like, the term “part-time”, but had I said the “effervescent” Minister of Transport, that would have been an adjective, the same as I would say a “part-time” Minister of Transport. The question · 28 wordsIf you do not find that this is correct, could you please inform me as to whether or not I should be referring to the “sometimes” House leaders—

At a glance

Nothing lost points.

Choose a measurement above to see how it scored.

Switch Claims on to list the checkable claims here.

What the tags mean

Signal · 100

Nothing lost points on Signal.

Signal checks whether every part makes a point, gives a reason, or asks for action. A low score means the speaker filled time with fluff, pleasantries, or attacks.

Relevance · no score

Not applicable: nothing to answer. Excluded from the average.

Relevance checks whether the speaker stays on topic and answers the question asked. A low score means the speaker dodged the issue.

Respect · 100

Nothing lost points on Respect.

Respect checks whether the speaker argued with people’s positions and records rather than attacking the people: insults, mockery, or bad motives assigned to them. Criticism of what someone did, however strong, is not marked.

Clarity · 100

Nothing lost points on Clarity.

Clarity checks for plain speaking, clear ownership of actions, and honest limits on certainty. A low score means vague promises or evasive language.

Claims · 2

This list shows the factual statements you can check for yourself: the words as said, and the claim restated to stand on its own.

1“you suggested that I should be using the proper title of a minister or a member”During question period on 2026-05-26, the Speaker told Dan Albas he should be using the proper title of a minister or a member.search
2“I did quite rightly refer to the Minister of Transport”In his comments during question period on 2026-05-26, Dan Albas referred to the Minister of Transport by that title.search

Analysed on 2026-10-20