Analysis · Debate reply · beta

Rob Moore

Conservative on Business of Supply 2026-05-26

106 words · 4 sentences · 5 clauses

Replying to Chris Lewis (Conservative). The question was off topic, so this reply is judged against the motion.

“Mr. Speaker, I have spoken at length, almost ad nauseam, with young adults in Essex. Basically, it has come to a point now where they are saying it is not even worth trying to save for a home. What I really found interesting was when the member talked about what we would say to the person at the gas pump. That really resonated with me. What is the message? What is the proper message? What do I send back to these young adults who are just trying to get ahead in Canada?”

Statement grade

Average 90 / 100

A score under 50 is red. Choose a measurement to see where it lost points and why; choose it again to clear.

Claims 60%Promise 21%The ask 19%

This view breaks the statement into its steps and names what each one does.

Mr. Speaker, Claims · 64 wordslike my hon. colleague in his riding, in my riding we also hear from young people who have given up hope on the Canadian dream, Partly on pointwhich is to own their own home, to raise a family here in Canada, to have a good job, to be able to save up some money and, heaven forbid, to be able to fill their car with gas. Promise · 22 wordsWhat I would say is that help is on its way.Vague promise Conservatives will keep fighting for affordability and fighting for those families.Vague promise The ask · 20 wordsWe are calling on the government today to adopt our motion to end the tax on fuel for this year.¹

At a glance

Lost points for

Switch Claims on to list the checkable claims here.

What the tags mean

Signal · 100

0 of 3 deductions are Signal

Signal checks whether every part makes a point, gives a reason, or asks for action. A low score means the speaker filled time with fluff, pleasantries, or attacks.

Nothing lost points.

Relevance · 85

1 of 3 deductions are Relevance

The question was off topic, so this reply is judged against the motion.

Relevance checks whether the speaker stays on topic and answers the question asked. A low score means the speaker dodged the issue. Measured against the motion under debate.

Staying near the subject without addressing the matter at hand: what was asked, or what the bill, motion or speech is about.What the tags mean “like my hon. colleague in his riding, in my riding we also hear from young people who have given up hope on the Canadian dream,”About young people losing hope in general, not the motion’s gas tax relief; the gas link only comes later.

Respect · 100

0 of 3 deductions are Respect

Respect checks whether the speaker argued with people’s positions and records rather than attacking the people: insults, mockery, or bad motives assigned to them. Criticism of what someone did, however strong, is not marked.

Nothing lost points.

Clarity · 74

2 of 3 deductions are Clarity

Clarity checks for plain speaking, clear ownership of actions, and honest limits on certainty. A low score means vague promises or evasive language.

A promise with no date, no measure and no one responsible.What the tags mean “help is on its way”The commitment names no actor, measure, date or success condition.
A promise with no date, no measure and no one responsible.What the tags mean “keep fighting for affordability”An open-ended commitment to fight with no measure, date or outcome named.

Claims · 1

This list shows the factual statements you can check for yourself: the words as said, and the claim restated to stand on its own.

1“end the tax on fuel for this year”The Conservative motion debated on May 26, 2026 calls on the government to end all federal taxes on gas and diesel for the rest of the year.search

Analysed on 2026-10-20