Kurt Holman

Mr. Speaker, Claims · 13 wordsthis morning millions of Canadians got in their vehicles and headed to work. Reasoning · 47 wordsThey did not have the luxury of deciding whether they needed fuel because they needed it. They needed it to get to work, to get their children to school, to care for their aging parents and to make deliveries, visit clients, run businesses and earn a living. Claims · 24 wordsWhen fuel prices rise sharply, as Canadians have experienced in recent months, fuel begins to take up a larger share of the household budget. Reasoning · 64 wordsThe money has to come from somewhere. The question is not whether Canadians will fill the tank, but what they will have to give up elsewhere in order to do it. Will it mean less money for groceries, for savings, for their children’s activities or to be set aside for an emergency? For millions of Canadians, fuel is not a luxury, but a necessity. Procedure · 9 wordsThat is why we are having this debate today.Procedure Claims · 36 wordsFuel prices are not shaped by one force alone. Global instability, energy markets, supply chains and economic uncertainty play a role. Canadians understand that.Unearned certainty There are many challenges facing Canadians that lie beyond the government’s control. Reasoning · 22 wordsGovernment cannot remove every one of those challenges, but at the very least it should not be making those challenges unnecessarily harder. Claims · 239 wordsThat simple principle is at the heart of our opposition day motion. I was reminded of that principle just a few days ago while hosting a seniors town hall in London—Fanshawe.Partly on point We discussed retirement security, the problems seniors are encountering with the dental care program and government services.Off point Once again, the cost of living dominated the conversation. Seniors spoke about the rising cost of groceries, about housing costs and about the everyday expenses that continue to rise while their incomes remained fixed. What struck me the most was not simply the concern about affordability itself. Many were not speaking only about themselves, but were worried about their children and their grandchildren. They see young families working hard and struggling just to get ahead. They see household budgets stretched thinner than ever. They worry that, despite all the speeches, promises and announcements coming from the Liberal government, things continue moving in the wrong direction. Whether it is a young family, a tradesperson, a small business owner or a senior, the concern is remarkably similar. Life is becoming more expensive.Partly on point People are feeling the pressure and they want the government to stop making it worse. In London—Fanshawe, we often experience these pressures early.Partly on point Our community is deeply connected to manufacturing, transportation and North American supply chains. We sit just over an hour from the United States border.² We understand better than most that Canada’s prosperity depends on our ability to compete. Reasoning · 40 wordsWhen uncertainty grows, communities like ours often feel it first.Off point When costs rise, we feel it.Partly on point When investment slows, we feel it. When businesses become hesitant about expansion, we feel it.Off point When families begin tightening household budgets, we feel it.Partly on point Claims · 12 wordsToday, London’s unemployment rate sits at 9.2%, the highest in the country.¹Off point Reasoning · 13 wordsCommunities like ours often experience economic pressures before much of the country does.Partly on point Positioning · 15 wordsThat is why London is the canary in the coal mine for the Canadian economy.Positioning Reasoning · 14 wordsWhat begins in communities like ours rarely stays there. The warning signs eventually spread. Positioning · 10 wordsToday, those warning signs are becoming increasingly difficult to ignore.Positioning Claims · 131 wordsBusinesses are increasingly looking beyond Canada for opportunities to invest and grow. Families are delaying purchases. Workers are wondering what the future holds. Because of our close economic ties to the United States, trade uncertainty is not an abstract policy decision for communities like ours. It affects investment decisions, hiring decisions and confidence. It affects whether businesses choose to expand or wait. Canadians were told that the Prime Minister was uniquely equipped to handle this challenge. They were told that he would use every tool available to strengthen Canada’s position. They were told that he would secure a deal, yet today Canadian businesses are still operating under the same uncertainty. Investment decisions are still being delayed, employers are still waiting for clarity and Canadian workers are still wondering what comes next. Reasoning · 100 wordsWe cannot control what President Trump says or does, no Canadian government can, but we can control how we position ourselves. We can control whether Canada is competing from a position of strength. We can control whether we are attracting investment or driving it away.Off point We can control whether we are making it easier or harder to build, produce, transport and compete here at home.Partly on point There are many challenges facing Canadians that lie beyond the government’s control. The government cannot remove every one of those challenges, but at the very least, it should not be making those challenges unnecessarily harder. Claims · 18 wordsCanadians are paying significantly more for fuel than Americans. Families, businesses, truckers and manufacturers all notice the difference. Positioning · 30 wordsThey are all asking a simple question: Why, at a time when Canadians are already facing so much economic pressure, is the government continuing to add costs of its own?Positioning Reasoning · 142 wordsCosts imposed on fuel do not stay at the gas station. They move through the entire economy. They affect transportation, agriculture, construction, manufacturing, deliveries and food prices. Every product that must be moved, every service that requires transportation and every business that depends on fuel eventually feels the impact. The costs go somewhere. They are reflected in prices, business decisions and competitiveness. Ultimately, they are reflected in the cost of living paid by Canadian families. That is why this debate is about more than what appears on the receipt at the pump. It is about whether Canadians can get ahead. It is about whether businesses can remain competitive. It is about whether our economy is becoming stronger or weaker. It is also about whether the government understands that every additional cost imposed on necessities eventually lands on the shoulders of ordinary Canadians. Positioning · 24 wordsThe issue extends beyond what Canadians pay at the pump. It speaks to a broader philosophy that treats higher costs as somebody else’s problem.Positioning Reasoning · 60 wordsWhether those costs are imposed through fuel taxes, the clean fuel standard or industrial carbon taxes, they do not disappear. They move through supply chains. They increase production costs. They increase transportation costs. They increase the cost of doing business. They ultimately make Canada less competitive. That matters for manufacturing, agriculture, transportation and industries that will shape the future economy. Claims · 26 wordsCountries around the world are competing for investment in advanced manufacturing, data centres and artificial intelligence. These industries require enormous amounts of affordable and reliable energy. Reasoning · 24 wordsIf Canada continues making energy more expensive while our competitors work to attract investment, we should not be surprised when the investment goes elsewhere. Claims · 65 wordsCanadians spent years warning government that affordability was becoming a crisis. Conservatives spent years warning government that affordability was becoming a crisis. For years, Canadians were told not to worry. For years, they were told that the carbon tax was the answer. Eventually, after years of pressure from Canadians and years of opposition from Conservatives, the government finally backed away from its signature carbon tax.³ Reasoning · 181 wordsHowever, the lesson was larger than a single tax. Canadians were not objecting to a single line item on a bill. They were objecting to a broader approach that kept making essential parts of life more expensive. The lesson was that affordability matters. The lesson was that governments cannot continually make necessities more expensive and expect Canadians not to notice. The lesson was that when families are struggling, the government should be looking for ways to reduce the burden, not increase it. That is why temporary relief on federal taxes applied to gasoline and diesel through the remainder of the year makes sense. Canadians need relief now. People are already feeling the impact of rising fuel costs. They do not need additional taxes that make the situation worse. It is also why permanently eliminating the clean fuel standard makes sense. Temporary pressures may justify temporary relief, but structural costs require structural solutions. At a time when affordability remains one of the defining challenges facing Canadians, government should not be in the business of making energy, transportation and everyday life more expensive. Claims · 28 wordsCanadians are doing their part. They are working hard. They are raising families. They are building businesses. They are adapting to challenges that often lie beyond their control. Reasoning · 34 wordsThere are many challenges facing Canadians that lie beyond the government’s control. Government cannot remove every one of those challenges, but at the very least, it should not be making those challenges unnecessarily harder. Claims · 9 wordsThat is exactly what this proposal seeks to accomplish. Procedure · 9 wordsFor that reason, I am pleased to support it.Procedure