← Back to the statement
Statement grade
The average of Signal, Respect and Clarity. Average 88 / 100
Signal
65 / 100
View details Viewing ↓
Relevance
–
Not scored Viewing ↓
Respect
100 / 100
View details Viewing ↓
Clarity
100 / 100
View details Viewing ↓
A score under 50 is red. Choose a measurement to see where it lost points and why; choose it again to clear.
Procedure 32% Claims 26% The question 43%
Structure · 4 steps
Claims · 2
This view breaks the statement into its steps and names what each one does.
Mr. Chair, Procedure · 15 words I will be sharing my time with the hon. member for Okanagan Lake West—South Kelowna. Procedure Claims · 12 words The question is about the letter the minister wrote in September 2025.1 The question · 20 words Will the minister table that letter in the House, and at the ethics committee when he appears on June 11?2
Signal · 65
1 of 1 deductions are Signal
Signal checks whether every part makes a point, gives a reason, or asks for action. A low score means the speaker filled time with fluff, pleasantries, or attacks.
Procedure Throat-clearing: announcing what you are about to say, or the House’s routine business. What the tags mean → “I will be sharing my time with the hon. member for Okanagan Lake West—South Kelowna.” Procedure or throat-clearing: no claim, reason or ask.
Relevance · no score
Not applicable: nothing to answer. Excluded from the average.
Relevance checks whether the speaker stays on topic and answers the question asked. A low score means the speaker dodged the issue.
Respect · 100
0 of 1 deductions are Respect
Respect checks whether the speaker argued with people’s positions and records rather than attacking the people: insults, mockery, or bad motives assigned to them. Criticism of what someone did, however strong, is not marked.
Nothing lost points.
Clarity · 100
0 of 1 deductions are Clarity
Clarity checks for plain speaking, clear ownership of actions, and honest limits on certainty. A low score means vague promises or evasive language.
Nothing lost points.
Claims · 2
This list shows the factual statements you can check for yourself: the words as said, and the claim restated to stand on its own.
1 “the letter the minister wrote in September 2025” The finance minister wrote a letter in September 2025. search 2 “when he appears on June 11” The minister is scheduled to appear at the ethics committee on June 11, 2026. search
