← Back to the statement
Statement grade
The average of Signal, Respect and Clarity. Average 91 / 100
Signal
100 / 100
View details Viewing ↓
Relevance
–
Not scored Viewing ↓
Respect
100 / 100
View details Viewing ↓
Clarity
73 / 100
View details Viewing ↓
A score under 50 is red. Choose a measurement to see where it lost points and why; choose it again to clear.
Claims 20% The ask 19% Reasoning 23% The question 38%
Structure · 5 steps
Claims · 2
This view breaks the statement into its steps and names what each one does.
Mr. Chair, Claims · 13 words it was the minister who said there would be a conflict of interest.1 The ask · 12 words The letter the minister provided to the Prime Minister should be furnished. Reasoning · 15 words Because we know it was shared with media, it should certainly be shared with parliamentarians.2 Unearned certainty The question · 24 words Why did the ethics screen the minister put in place not prevent him from participating in discussions, decisions, debates or votes related to Alto?
At a glance
Lost points for Unearned certainty
Switch Claims on to list the checkable claims here.
What the tags mean →
Signal · 100
0 of 1 deductions are Signal
Signal checks whether every part makes a point, gives a reason, or asks for action. A low score means the speaker filled time with fluff, pleasantries, or attacks.
Nothing lost points.
Relevance · no score
Not applicable: nothing to answer. Excluded from the average.
Relevance checks whether the speaker stays on topic and answers the question asked. A low score means the speaker dodged the issue.
Respect · 100
0 of 1 deductions are Respect
Respect checks whether the speaker argued with people’s positions and records rather than attacking the people: insults, mockery, or bad motives assigned to them. Criticism of what someone did, however strong, is not marked.
Nothing lost points.
Clarity · 73
1 of 1 deductions are Clarity
Clarity checks for plain speaking, clear ownership of actions, and honest limits on certainty. A low score means vague promises or evasive language.
Unearned certainty Something stated as certain with nothing to back it. What the tags mean → “we know it was shared with media” The claim of shared knowledge is asserted in place of naming a source for the letter having gone to media.
Claims · 2
This list shows the factual statements you can check for yourself: the words as said, and the claim restated to stand on its own.
1 “it was the minister who said there would be a conflict of interest” The finance minister said there would be a conflict of interest. search 2 “it was shared with media” The minister’s letter to the Prime Minister was shared with media. search
