← Back to the statement
Statement grade
The average of Signal, Respect and Clarity. Average 90 / 100
Signal
71 / 100
View details Viewing ↓
Relevance
–
Not scored Viewing ↓
Respect
100 / 100
View details Viewing ↓
Clarity
100 / 100
View details Viewing ↓
A score under 50 is red. Choose a measurement to see where it lost points and why; choose it again to clear.
Procedure 26% Claims 50% The question 24%
Structure · 4 steps
Claims · 2
This view breaks the statement into its steps and names what each one does.
Mr. Chair, Procedure · 12 words I will be splitting my time with the member for Calgary East. Procedure Claims · 23 words Norway’s sovereign wealth fund is considered the gold standard, and its success is driven by reinvested budget surpluses and oil and gas revenue.1 The question · 11 words Where is the $25-billion seed money coming from for Canada’s fund?2
Signal · 71
1 of 1 deductions are Signal
Signal checks whether every part makes a point, gives a reason, or asks for action. A low score means the speaker filled time with fluff, pleasantries, or attacks.
Procedure Throat-clearing: announcing what you are about to say, or the House’s routine business. What the tags mean → “I will be splitting my time with the member for Calgary East.” Procedure or throat-clearing: no claim, reason or ask.
Relevance · no score
Not applicable: nothing to answer. Excluded from the average.
Relevance checks whether the speaker stays on topic and answers the question asked. A low score means the speaker dodged the issue.
Respect · 100
0 of 1 deductions are Respect
Respect checks whether the speaker argued with people’s positions and records rather than attacking the people: insults, mockery, or bad motives assigned to them. Criticism of what someone did, however strong, is not marked.
Nothing lost points.
Clarity · 100
0 of 1 deductions are Clarity
Clarity checks for plain speaking, clear ownership of actions, and honest limits on certainty. A low score means vague promises or evasive language.
Nothing lost points.
Claims · 2
This list shows the factual statements you can check for yourself: the words as said, and the claim restated to stand on its own.
1 “its success is driven by reinvested budget surpluses and oil and gas revenue” Norway’s sovereign wealth fund is funded by reinvested budget surpluses and oil and gas revenue. search 2 “$25-billion seed money” Canada’s proposed sovereign wealth fund has $25 billion in seed money. search
