Analysis · Debate question · beta

Sandra Cobena

Conservative on Business of Supply 2026-05-26

63 words · 4 sentences · 5 clauses

Statement grade

A+

Average 97 / 100

A score under 50 is red. Choose a measurement to see where it lost points and why; choose it again to clear.

Procedure 8%Claims 62%The question 30%

This view breaks the statement into its steps and names what each one does.

Mr. Chair, Procedure · 5 wordswe actually have an example.Procedure Claims · 39 wordsThe Liberals established the Canada Infrastructure Bank.² It was supposed to support infrastructure projects that are in the public interest, ³and it cannot even deploy the $35 billion it was given because of regulatory roadblocks that the government creates.¹ The question · 19 wordsHow can the minister pretend that this fund will be able to deploy the funds it will be given?

At a glance

Lost points for

Switch Claims on to list the checkable claims here.

What the tags mean

Signal · 90

1 of 1 deductions are Signal

Signal checks whether every part makes a point, gives a reason, or asks for action. A low score means the speaker filled time with fluff, pleasantries, or attacks.

Throat-clearing: announcing what you are about to say, or the House’s routine business.What the tags mean “we actually have an example.”Procedure or throat-clearing: no claim, reason or ask.

Relevance · no score

Not applicable: nothing to answer. Excluded from the average.

Relevance checks whether the speaker stays on topic and answers the question asked. A low score means the speaker dodged the issue.

Respect · 100

0 of 1 deductions are Respect

Respect checks whether the speaker argued with people’s positions and records rather than attacking the people: insults, mockery, or bad motives assigned to them. Criticism of what someone did, however strong, is not marked.

Nothing lost points.

Clarity · 100

0 of 1 deductions are Clarity

Clarity checks for plain speaking, clear ownership of actions, and honest limits on certainty. A low score means vague promises or evasive language.

Nothing lost points.

Claims · 3

This list shows the factual statements you can check for yourself: the words as said, and the claim restated to stand on its own.

1“cannot even deploy the $35 billion it was given”The Canada Infrastructure Bank cannot even deploy the $35 billion it was given.search
2“The Liberals established the Canada Infrastructure Bank”The Liberals established the Canada Infrastructure Bank.search
3“support infrastructure projects that are in the public interest”The Canada Infrastructure Bank was supposed to support infrastructure projects that are in the public interest.search

Analysed on 2026-10-20