← Back to the statement
Statement grade
The average of Signal, Respect and Clarity. Average 100 / 100
Signal
100 / 100
View details Viewing ↓
Relevance
–
Not scored Viewing ↓
Respect
100 / 100
View details Viewing ↓
Clarity
100 / 100
View details Viewing ↓
A score under 50 is red. Choose a measurement to see where it lost points and why; choose it again to clear.
Claims 81% The question 19%
Structure · 3 steps
Claims · 4
This view breaks the statement into its steps and names what each one does.
Mr. Speaker, Claims · 58 words the Prime Minister called Beijing Canada’s greatest security threat.1 That was during the election. Despite this, within a year, he signed a memorandum of understanding with Communist China as it relates to security matters.2 I have been asking for that memorandum of understanding for over five months.3 The minister and the Prime Minister have refused to disclose it.4 The question · 14 words When will they produce the memorandum of understanding that was signed with Communist China?
At a glance
Nothing lost points.
Choose a measurement above to see how it scored.
Switch Claims on to list the checkable claims here.
What the tags mean →
Signal · 100
Nothing lost points on Signal.
Signal checks whether every part makes a point, gives a reason, or asks for action. A low score means the speaker filled time with fluff, pleasantries, or attacks.
Relevance · no score
Not applicable: nothing to answer. Excluded from the average.
Relevance checks whether the speaker stays on topic and answers the question asked. A low score means the speaker dodged the issue.
Respect · 100
Nothing lost points on Respect.
Respect checks whether the speaker argued with people’s positions and records rather than attacking the people: insults, mockery, or bad motives assigned to them. Criticism of what someone did, however strong, is not marked.
Clarity · 100
Nothing lost points on Clarity.
Clarity checks for plain speaking, clear ownership of actions, and honest limits on certainty. A low score means vague promises or evasive language.
Claims · 4
This list shows the factual statements you can check for yourself: the words as said, and the claim restated to stand on its own.
1 “the Prime Minister called Beijing Canada’s greatest security threat” Canada’s Prime Minister said Beijing is Canada’s greatest security threat. search 2 “within a year, he signed a memorandum of understanding with Communist China as it relates to security matters” Within a year of calling Beijing Canada’s greatest security threat, Canada’s Prime Minister signed a memorandum of understanding with China relating to security matters. search 3 “I have been asking for that memorandum of understanding for over five months” Frank Caputo has been asking for the Canada-China security memorandum of understanding for over five months as of May 27, 2026. search 4 “refused to disclose it” The public safety minister and the Prime Minister have refused to disclose the Canada-China security memorandum of understanding. search
