“Madam Speaker, the member has obviously called out the Liberals for their repeated use of section 107 to take away the right to strike. I have been here a long time, and what I find interesting and curious is that at no point in the last 10 or 12 years did anyone call for the repeal of section 107. In fact, the section has been in place for a very long time, and no one has thought it necessary to repeal it. Would it not actually be the Liberal government’s weaponization of section 107, specifically weaponizing referrals to the CIRB, to take away the right to strike and doing it eight times in 13 months that is the problem, and not the section in and of itself?”
Statement grade
B
The average of Signal, Relevance, Respect and Clarity is 82. The grade is held to 75, 30 above Signal.
75 / 100, held down by Signal
A score under 50 is red. Choose a measurement to see where it lost points and why; choose it again to clear.
Positioning 51%Claims 49%
This view breaks the statement into its steps and names what each one does.
Madam Speaker, Positioning · 23 wordsI want to be really clear that the Conservatives are no friends of workers either, Off pointbut I have to agree with my colleague.PositioningClaims · 51 wordsOur current Prime Minister seems to have a worse track record than Prime Minister Harper, if members can believe it, in the government’s use of section 107, which brings up the reason that unions from across the country, including the CLC, which represents three million workers, are asking to repeal it.12Positioning · 30 wordsWho knows how many more times the Liberal government is going to force people back to work, including unpaid work, and side with the billionaire class and its corporate buddies?Positioning
