Analysis · Reply to a comment · beta

Pierre Poilievre

126 words · 9 sentences · 10 clauses

Replying to Mario Simard (Bloc Québécois)
“Mr. Speaker, if the Leader of the Opposition wants to reduce the debt and support people as they cope with inflation, all he has to do is stop funding the state-sponsored cronyism in the oil and gas sector that he defends tooth and nail. The motion before us today is an insult to francophones, who form a cultural minority. If they wish to preserve their cultural expressions, they need funding. What the Leader of the Opposition is telling us is that, from a trade point of view, we are a nuisance. He should be ashamed for saying that.”
Statement grade
A+
Average 96 / 100
A score under 50 is red. Choose a measurement to see where it lost points and why; choose it again to clear.
Positioning 6%Claims 90%Procedure 5%

This view breaks the statement into its steps and names what each one does.

Mr. Speaker, Positioning · 7 wordsthe hon. member should do his research.Positioning Claims · 70 wordsI have never supported any form of corporate welfare for any industry.1 I will also let him know that the oil and gas sector is in no need of corporate welfare. It could be very profitable if we could get the government out of the way. Oil companies can pay more and contribute more to our economy, but we would have to get the Liberal government out of the way. Procedure · 6 wordsNow let us talk about taxes.Procedure Claims · 43 wordsThe Bloc Québécois believes that the only way to protect culture is to increase consumer taxes. Conservatives believe exactly the opposite. We believe that money should stay in consumers’ pockets so they can decide what cultural content and programs they want to watch.

Analysed on