Analysis · Question Period answer · beta

Joël Lightbound

Liberal on Finance 2026-05-28

81 words · 3 sentences · 4 clauses

Replying to Jason Groleau (Conservative)

“Mr. Speaker, I’m sure our Prime Minister has never heard of our local wine, Harfang des Neiges. Why does the Prime Minister need a luxury meal for his official trips? This is taxpayers’ money spent on $195,000 worth of food for just three flights. Imagine that, folks. Is a little chicken or a nice lasagna not good enough for the Prime Minister? When will the Liberal Prime Minister stop breaking the bank at the expense of the people of Beauce?”

Statement grade

30 / 100, held down by Relevance

A score under 50 is red. Choose a measurement to see where it lost points and why; choose it again to clear.

Claims 63%Procedure 6%Positioning 31%

This view breaks the statement into its steps and names what each one does.

Mr. Speaker, Claims · 51 wordswhat is fascinating when I hear my colleague’s question is that he would break the bank for the people of Beauce by depriving over 30,000 of his constituents of the Canadian dental care plan.¹ He would deprive thousands more families of over $80 million per year from the Canada child benefit, ²Off pointProcedure · 5 wordsand the list goes on.Procedure Positioning · 25 wordsWhen it comes to lowering the cost of living for Quebeckers and the people of Beauce, we will not take any lessons from this member.PositioningOff point

At a glance

Lost points for
Didn't answerNone of this answer addressed the specific question that was asked.

Switch Claims on to list the checkable claims here.

What the tags mean

Signal · 57

2 of 5 deductions are Signal

Signal checks whether every part makes a point, gives a reason, or asks for action. A low score means the speaker filled time with fluff, pleasantries, or attacks.

Throat-clearing: announcing what you are about to say, or the House’s routine business.What the tags mean “and the list goes on.”Procedure or throat-clearing: no claim, reason or ask.
Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it.What the tags mean “When it comes to lowering the cost of living for Quebeckers and the people of Beauce, we will not take any lessons from this member.”Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.

Relevance · 0

3 of 5 deductions are Relevance

Relevance checks whether the speaker stays on topic and answers the question asked. A low score means the speaker dodged the issue. Measured against the question asked.

Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate.What the tags mean “what is fascinating when I hear my colleague’s question is that he would break the bank for the people of Beauce by depriving over 30,000 of his constituents of the Canadian dental care plan.”An attack on the member’s record on the dental care plan, offered in place of an answer on meal spending.
Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate.What the tags mean “He would deprive thousands more families of over $80 million per year from the Canada child benefit,”About the member’s record on the Canada child benefit, not the meal spending asked about.
Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate.What the tags mean “When it comes to lowering the cost of living for Quebeckers and the people of Beauce, we will not take any lessons from this member.”Rejects taking lessons from the questioner rather than answering when the meal spending will stop.

Respect · 100

0 of 5 deductions are Respect

Respect checks whether the speaker argued with people’s positions and records rather than attacking the people: insults, mockery, or bad motives assigned to them. Criticism of what someone did, however strong, is not marked.

Nothing lost points.

Clarity · 100

0 of 5 deductions are Clarity

Clarity checks for plain speaking, clear ownership of actions, and honest limits on certainty. A low score means vague promises or evasive language.

Nothing lost points.

Claims · 2

This list shows the factual statements you can check for yourself: the words as said, and the claim restated to stand on its own.

1“depriving over 30,000 of his constituents of the Canadian dental care plan”Over 30,000 of the member for Beauce’s constituents are covered by the Canadian dental care plan.search
2“thousands more families of over $80 million per year from the Canada child benefit”Families in Beauce receive over $80 million per year from the Canada child benefit.search

Analysed on 2026-10-20