Analysis · Debate reply · beta

Sandra Cobena

104 words · 7 sentences · 7 clauses

Replying to Alexis Deschênes (Bloc Québécois)
“Mr. Speaker, on the whole, I agree with my colleague. We are witnessing a pathetic display of obsequiousness by the Conservative Party today. It has decided to champion the interests of American companies in the House even as our culture and media sectors are being hit hard by an unprecedented advertising revenue crisis. We have to support them. Some American companies are going to use our cultural products to make a profit here, yet we should not tax them. How is that fair?”
Statement grade
A
Average 90 / 100
A score under 50 is red. Choose a measurement to see where it lost points and why; choose it again to clear.
Claims 35%Positioning 28%Reasoning 32%Procedure 6%

This view breaks the statement into its steps and names what each one does.

Mr. Speaker, Claims · 14 wordsI would like to reassure the member that this is not about American companies. Positioning · 29 wordsIt is disappointing to hear the question framed as if a Canadian would put the interests of an American company ahead of the people we represent. That is unacceptable.Positioning Reasoning · 18 wordsThe principle we are talking about here is chasing away investment and opportunity for Canadians and Canadian content. Procedure · 6 wordsThat is what this is about.Procedure Reasoning · 15 wordsWhether it is an American or a European company investing here, it does not matter. Claims · 22 wordsAt the heart of this debate are the Canadian creators and artists who are fighting for a chance to showcase their work.

Analysed on