← Back to the statement
Statement grade
Not graded: fewer than 4 clauses beyond the address. The scores are shown; a grade would say little. Not graded
Signal
100 / 100
View details Viewing ↓
Relevance
68 / 100
View details Viewing ↓
Respect
100 / 100
View details Viewing ↓
Clarity
0 / 100
View details Viewing ↓
A score under 50 is red. Choose a measurement to see where it lost points and why; choose it again to clear.
Claims 100%
Structure · 2 steps
Claims · 0
This view breaks the statement into its steps and names what each one does.
Mr. Chair, Claims · 21 words we have a proactive response to all misconduct, Vague promise and action is appropriately managed. Partly on point Hidden agency There have been some who have been fired. Hidden agency
At a glance
Lost points for Partly on point ×2 Hidden agency ×2 Vague promise
Switch Claims on to list the checkable claims here.
What the tags mean →
Signal · 100
0 of 5 deductions are Signal
Signal checks whether every part makes a point, gives a reason, or asks for action. A low score means the speaker filled time with fluff, pleasantries, or attacks.
Nothing lost points.
Relevance · 68
2 of 5 deductions are Relevance
Relevance checks whether the speaker stays on topic and answers the question asked. A low score means the speaker dodged the issue. Measured against the point put to the member, and the motion under debate.
Partly on point Staying near the subject without addressing the matter at hand: what was asked, or what the bill, motion or speech is about. What the tags mean → “we have a proactive response to all misconduct,” About IRCC’s approach to misconduct generally, not the number of officials fired.
Partly on point Staying near the subject without addressing the matter at hand: what was asked, or what the bill, motion or speech is about. What the tags mean → “and action is appropriately managed.” About how misconduct is managed, not the number asked for.
Respect · 100
0 of 5 deductions are Respect
Respect checks whether the speaker argued with people’s positions and records rather than attacking the people: insults, mockery, or bad motives assigned to them. Criticism of what someone did, however strong, is not marked.
Nothing lost points.
Clarity · 0
3 of 5 deductions are Clarity
Clarity checks for plain speaking, clear ownership of actions, and honest limits on certainty. A low score means vague promises or evasive language.
Vague promise A promise with no date, no measure and no one responsible. What the tags mean → “we have a proactive response to all misconduct” The speaker asserts her side responds proactively without naming any measure, actor or standard.
Hidden agency Wording that hides who did something, or who will. What the tags mean → “action is appropriately managed” The passive does not say who manages the action, which is the question posed.
Hidden agency Wording that hides who did something, or who will. What the tags mean → “There have been some who have been fired” The passive avoids naming who fired them, directly evading the question asked.
Claims · 0
This list shows the factual statements you can check for yourself: the words as said, and the claim restated to stand on its own.
No checkable claims.
