← Back to the statement
Statement grade
The average of Signal, Relevance, Respect and Clarity is 87. The grade is held to 79, 30 above Relevance. 79 / 100, held down by Relevance
Signal
100 / 100
View details Viewing ↓
Relevance
49 / 100
View details Viewing ↓
Respect
100 / 100
View details Viewing ↓
Clarity
100 / 100
View details Viewing ↓
A score under 50 is red. Choose a measurement to see where it lost points and why; choose it again to clear.
Claims 100%
Structure · 2 steps
Claims · 2
This view breaks the statement into its steps and names what each one does.
Mr. Chair, Claims · 27 words IRGC officials, as we have said, are inadmissible to Canada. It was the Liberal government that put that ban in place, 1 and it continues to be there.2 Partly on point
At a glance
Lost points for Partly on point ×4 Didn't answer None of this reply addressed the specific point raised or the topic under debate.
Switch Claims on to list the checkable claims here.
What the tags mean →
Signal · 100
0 of 4 deductions are Signal
Signal checks whether every part makes a point, gives a reason, or asks for action. A low score means the speaker filled time with fluff, pleasantries, or attacks.
Nothing lost points.
Relevance · 49
4 of 4 deductions are Relevance
Relevance checks whether the speaker stays on topic and answers the question asked. A low score means the speaker dodged the issue. Measured against the point put to the member, and the motion under debate.
Partly on point Staying near the subject without addressing the matter at hand: what was asked, or what the bill, motion or speech is about. What the tags mean → “IRGC officials,” Names the subject of the IRGC officials but does not address the removal count or the trust question put.
Partly on point Staying near the subject without addressing the matter at hand: what was asked, or what the bill, motion or speech is about. What the tags mean → “as we have said, are inadmissible to Canada.” Speaks to admissibility rules for IRGC officials, not to how many have been removed or the trust asked about.
Partly on point Staying near the subject without addressing the matter at hand: what was asked, or what the bill, motion or speech is about. What the tags mean → “It was the Liberal government that put that ban in place,” Crediting the government for the ban does not answer the question about removals or trust.
Partly on point Staying near the subject without addressing the matter at hand: what was asked, or what the bill, motion or speech is about. What the tags mean → “and it continues to be there.” Notes the ban remains in place, which stays on the IRGC subject without addressing the point put.
Respect · 100
0 of 4 deductions are Respect
Respect checks whether the speaker argued with people’s positions and records rather than attacking the people: insults, mockery, or bad motives assigned to them. Criticism of what someone did, however strong, is not marked.
Nothing lost points.
Clarity · 100
0 of 4 deductions are Clarity
Clarity checks for plain speaking, clear ownership of actions, and honest limits on certainty. A low score means vague promises or evasive language.
Nothing lost points.
Claims · 2
This list shows the factual statements you can check for yourself: the words as said, and the claim restated to stand on its own.
1 “It was the Liberal government that put that ban in place” The Liberal government put in place the ban making IRGC officials inadmissible to Canada. search 2 “and it continues to be there” The ban making IRGC officials inadmissible to Canada remains in force. search
