Analysis · Debate reply · beta

Lena Metlege Diab

Liberal on Business of Supply 2026-05-28

35 words · 4 sentences · 4 clauses

Replying to Harb Gill (Conservative)

“Mr. Chair, the media knew for months that gangs were targeting immigrant communities with threats and extortion. Local newspapers were more aware of the danger than the minister was. Is the minister’s department embarrassed by her lack of action?”

Statement grade

A+

Average 100 / 100

A score under 50 is red. Choose a measurement to see where it lost points and why; choose it again to clear.

Claims 100%

This view breaks the statement into its steps and names what each one does.

Mr. Chair, Claims · 35 wordswe screen every applicant who is coming to Canada, regardless of the reason they are coming.¹ CBSA removes serious criminals who have no right to be here.² We work with policing. We work with RCMP—

At a glance

AnsweredOf this reply, 100% addressed the question or point raised.

Switch Claims on to list the checkable claims here.

What the tags mean

Signal · 100

Nothing lost points on Signal.

Signal checks whether every part makes a point, gives a reason, or asks for action. A low score means the speaker filled time with fluff, pleasantries, or attacks.

Relevance · 100

Nothing lost points on Relevance.

Relevance checks whether the speaker stays on topic and answers the question asked. A low score means the speaker dodged the issue. Measured against the point put to the member, and the motion under debate.

Respect · 100

Nothing lost points on Respect.

Respect checks whether the speaker argued with people’s positions and records rather than attacking the people: insults, mockery, or bad motives assigned to them. Criticism of what someone did, however strong, is not marked.

Clarity · 100

Nothing lost points on Clarity.

Clarity checks for plain speaking, clear ownership of actions, and honest limits on certainty. A low score means vague promises or evasive language.

Claims · 2

This list shows the factual statements you can check for yourself: the words as said, and the claim restated to stand on its own.

1“we screen every applicant who is coming to Canada, regardless of the reason they are coming”Canada’s immigration system screens every applicant coming to Canada, regardless of the reason they are coming.search
2“CBSA removes serious criminals who have no right to be here”The CBSA removes serious criminals who have no right to be in Canada.search

Analysed on 2026-10-20