Analysis · Debate question · beta

Michelle Rempel Garner

Conservative on Business of Supply 2026-05-28

86 words · 7 sentences · 9 clauses

Statement grade

A+

Average 100 / 100

A score under 50 is red. Choose a measurement to see where it lost points and why; choose it again to clear.

The question 21%Claims 79%

This view breaks the statement into its steps and names what each one does.

Mr. Chair, The question · 10 wordsdoes the minister realize how inane and uncompassionate she sounds? Claims · 68 wordsShe says, “Oh, there is nothing in the law that says this.” It says it in the law.¹ My bill would have closed this loophole, ²and she could have gone to the justice minister and told him to close this loophole. She sat back and said that it was fine. No, the result is what my colleague just said: people being strangled and their abusers staying in Canada. The question · 8 wordsWhy will she not advocate to deport them?

At a glance

Nothing lost points.

Choose a measurement above to see how it scored.

Switch Claims on to list the checkable claims here.

What the tags mean

Signal · 100

Nothing lost points on Signal.

Signal checks whether every part makes a point, gives a reason, or asks for action. A low score means the speaker filled time with fluff, pleasantries, or attacks.

Relevance · no score

Not applicable: nothing to answer. Excluded from the average.

Relevance checks whether the speaker stays on topic and answers the question asked. A low score means the speaker dodged the issue.

Respect · 100

Nothing lost points on Respect.

Respect checks whether the speaker argued with people’s positions and records rather than attacking the people: insults, mockery, or bad motives assigned to them. Criticism of what someone did, however strong, is not marked.

Clarity · 100

Nothing lost points on Clarity.

Clarity checks for plain speaking, clear ownership of actions, and honest limits on certainty. A low score means vague promises or evasive language.

Claims · 2

This list shows the factual statements you can check for yourself: the words as said, and the claim restated to stand on its own.

1“It says it in the law.”Canadian law addresses the situation the minister said was not covered by the law.search
2“My bill would have closed this loophole”Michelle Rempel Garner tabled a bill that would have addressed the immigration loophole under discussion.search

Analysed on 2026-10-20