Analysis · Debate reply · beta

Lena Metlege Diab

62 words · 6 sentences · 6 clauses

Replying to Michelle Rempel Garner (Conservative)
“Mr. Chair, that translates to blah, blah, blah, another rapist stays in Canada, blah, blah, blah, another thief stays in Canada, blah, blah, blah, another extortionist stays in Canada. This is integral to Canadian national identity. They have to respect the rule of law. What the Liberals are saying is that if they commit a serious crime, as guests in our country, they can stay here because the Liberals refuse to close this loophole that is being exploited by a woke judiciary. Will they do the right thing and finally close it?”
Statement grade
C
64 / 100, held down by Relevance
A score under 50 is red. Choose a measurement to see where it lost points and why; choose it again to clear.
Positioning 37%Claims 63%

This view breaks the statement into its steps and names what each one does.

Mr. Chair, Positioning · 6 wordspublic safety is our top priority.PositioningPartly on point Claims · 10 wordsIn fact, I was a justice minister provincially in 2013.1 Positioning · 7 wordsI understand that more than anyone else.PositioningOff point Claims · 29 wordsWe have multiple crime bills before us in this House that that party and that member have been obstructing since we came here.2 We are investing in law enforcement.Vague promise Positioning · 10 wordsOur priority is to ensure that Canadians are kept safe.PositioningPartly on point

Analysed on