← Back to the statement
Statement grade
The average of Signal, Relevance, Respect and Clarity. Average 76 / 100
Signal
100 / 100
View details Viewing ↓
Relevance
47 / 100
View details Viewing ↓
Respect
100 / 100
View details Viewing ↓
Clarity
59 / 100
View details Viewing ↓
A score under 50 is red. Choose a measurement to see where it lost points and why; choose it again to clear.
Claims 100%
Structure · 2 steps
Claims · 3
This view breaks the statement into its steps and names what each one does.
Mr. Chair, Claims · 59 words we are reducing the share of non-permanent residents, including workers, to less than 5% of Canada’s population by the end of 2027.1 Vague promise That was the mandate and commitment we made in the election.2 Canadians elected this government. The Prime Minister has made that a mandate that he provided to all ministers.3 The Parliamentary Budget Officer has confirmed we are— Partly on point
At a glance
Lost points for Partly on point ×5 Vague promise Didn't answer None of this reply addressed the specific point raised or the topic under debate.
Switch Claims on to list the checkable claims here.
What the tags mean →
Signal · 100
0 of 6 deductions are Signal
Signal checks whether every part makes a point, gives a reason, or asks for action. A low score means the speaker filled time with fluff, pleasantries, or attacks.
Nothing lost points.
Relevance · 47
5 of 6 deductions are Relevance
Relevance checks whether the speaker stays on topic and answers the question asked. A low score means the speaker dodged the issue. Measured against the point put to the member, and the motion under debate.
Partly on point Staying near the subject without addressing the matter at hand: what was asked, or what the bill, motion or speech is about. What the tags mean → “we are reducing the share of non-permanent residents, including workers, to less than 5% of Canada’s population by the end of 2027.” About the overall target for non-permanent residents, not the increase in permits the member asked about.
Partly on point Staying near the subject without addressing the matter at hand: what was asked, or what the bill, motion or speech is about. What the tags mean → “That was the mandate and commitment we made in the election.” About the government’s election mandate, not the rise in permits asked about.
Partly on point Staying near the subject without addressing the matter at hand: what was asked, or what the bill, motion or speech is about. What the tags mean → “Canadians elected this government.” About the election result itself, not the permit numbers or the question of acceleration.
Partly on point Staying near the subject without addressing the matter at hand: what was asked, or what the bill, motion or speech is about. What the tags mean → “The Prime Minister has made that a mandate that he provided to all ministers.” About the Prime Minister’s mandate to ministers, not the permits question asked.
Partly on point Staying near the subject without addressing the matter at hand: what was asked, or what the bill, motion or speech is about. What the tags mean → “The Parliamentary Budget Officer has confirmed we are—” Begins a point about the Parliamentary Budget Officer’s view of the target, not the increase in permits asked about.
Respect · 100
0 of 6 deductions are Respect
Respect checks whether the speaker argued with people’s positions and records rather than attacking the people: insults, mockery, or bad motives assigned to them. Criticism of what someone did, however strong, is not marked.
Nothing lost points.
Clarity · 59
1 of 6 deductions are Clarity
Clarity checks for plain speaking, clear ownership of actions, and honest limits on certainty. A low score means vague promises or evasive language.
Vague promise A promise with no date, no measure and no one responsible. What the tags mean → “we are reducing the share of non-permanent residents” A commitment with a target date but no measure or stated action showing how the reduction will be achieved.
Claims · 3
This list shows the factual statements you can check for yourself: the words as said, and the claim restated to stand on its own.
1 “reducing the share of non-permanent residents, including workers, to less than 5% of Canada’s population by the end of 2027” The government’s target is to reduce non-permanent residents, including workers, to less than 5% of Canada’s population by the end of 2027. search 2 “the mandate and commitment we made in the election” Reducing the non-permanent resident share to below 5% by end of 2027 was a commitment the Liberal Party made in the election. search 3 “The Prime Minister has made that a mandate that he provided to all ministers” The Prime Minister issued mandate letters to all ministers that include the non-permanent resident reduction target. search
