← Back to the statement
Statement grade
The average of Signal, Relevance, Respect and Clarity is 84. The grade is held to 79, 30 above Relevance. 79 / 100, held down by Relevance
Signal
89 / 100
View details Viewing ↓
Relevance
49 / 100
View details Viewing ↓
Respect
100 / 100
View details Viewing ↓
Clarity
100 / 100
View details Viewing ↓
A score under 50 is red. Choose a measurement to see where it lost points and why; choose it again to clear.
Claims 90% Procedure 10%
Structure · 3 steps
Claims · 3
This view breaks the statement into its steps and names what each one does.
Mr. Chair, Claims · 28 words when it comes to inadmissibility, some travellers are never issued permission to travel.1 Some travellers have their authority revoked before they travel.2 Other travellers are deported from airports.3 Partly on point Procedure · 3 words There are multiple— Procedure
At a glance
Lost points for Partly on point ×3 Procedure Didn't answer None of this reply addressed the specific point raised or the topic under debate.
Switch Claims on to list the checkable claims here.
What the tags mean →
Signal · 89
1 of 4 deductions are Signal
Signal checks whether every part makes a point, gives a reason, or asks for action. A low score means the speaker filled time with fluff, pleasantries, or attacks.
Procedure Throat-clearing: announcing what you are about to say, or the House’s routine business. What the tags mean → “There are multiple—” Procedure or throat-clearing: no claim, reason or ask.
Relevance · 49
3 of 4 deductions are Relevance
Relevance checks whether the speaker stays on topic and answers the question asked. A low score means the speaker dodged the issue. Measured against the point put to the member, and the motion under debate.
Partly on point Staying near the subject without addressing the matter at hand: what was asked, or what the bill, motion or speech is about. What the tags mean → “when it comes to inadmissibility, some travellers are never issued permission to travel.” About inadmissibility generally, not the yes-or-no question about reviewing granted visas.
Partly on point Staying near the subject without addressing the matter at hand: what was asked, or what the bill, motion or speech is about. What the tags mean → “Some travellers have their authority revoked before they travel.” Describes revocations before travel, not whether the department is reviewing visas issued without security checks.
Partly on point Staying near the subject without addressing the matter at hand: what was asked, or what the bill, motion or speech is about. What the tags mean → “Other travellers are deported from airports.” About deportations at airports, not the review of previously granted visas asked about.
Respect · 100
0 of 4 deductions are Respect
Respect checks whether the speaker argued with people’s positions and records rather than attacking the people: insults, mockery, or bad motives assigned to them. Criticism of what someone did, however strong, is not marked.
Nothing lost points.
Clarity · 100
0 of 4 deductions are Clarity
Clarity checks for plain speaking, clear ownership of actions, and honest limits on certainty. A low score means vague promises or evasive language.
Nothing lost points.
Claims · 3
This list shows the factual statements you can check for yourself: the words as said, and the claim restated to stand on its own.
1 “some travellers are never issued permission to travel” Some travellers seeking to come to Canada are never issued permission to travel due to inadmissibility rules. search 2 “Some travellers have their authority revoked before they travel” Some travellers to Canada have their travel authority revoked before they travel. search 3 “Other travellers are deported from airports” Some inadmissible travellers are deported from Canadian airports. search
