← Back to the statement
Statement grade
Not graded: fewer than 4 clauses beyond the address. The scores are shown; a grade would say little. Not graded
Signal
100 / 100
View details Viewing ↓
Relevance
49 / 100
View details Viewing ↓
Respect
100 / 100
View details Viewing ↓
Clarity
100 / 100
View details Viewing ↓
A score under 50 is red. Choose a measurement to see where it lost points and why; choose it again to clear.
Claims 100%
Structure · 2 steps
Claims · 2
This view breaks the statement into its steps and names what each one does.
Mr. Chair, Claims · 23 words if we find a person in Canada who has committed a crime, Canada Border Services Agency investigates that, 1 and they could become inadmissible.2 Partly on point
At a glance
Lost points for Partly on point ×2 Didn't answer None of this reply addressed the specific point raised or the topic under debate.
Switch Claims on to list the checkable claims here.
What the tags mean →
Signal · 100
0 of 2 deductions are Signal
Signal checks whether every part makes a point, gives a reason, or asks for action. A low score means the speaker filled time with fluff, pleasantries, or attacks.
Nothing lost points.
Relevance · 49
2 of 2 deductions are Relevance
Relevance checks whether the speaker stays on topic and answers the question asked. A low score means the speaker dodged the issue. Measured against the point put to the member, and the motion under debate.
Partly on point Staying near the subject without addressing the matter at hand: what was asked, or what the bill, motion or speech is about. What the tags mean → “if we find a person in Canada who has committed a crime, Canada Border Services Agency investigates that,” About CBSA’s investigation of criminals, not whether the IRB acting against the laws is a problem.
Partly on point Staying near the subject without addressing the matter at hand: what was asked, or what the bill, motion or speech is about. What the tags mean → “and they could become inadmissible.” About possible inadmissibility findings, not the question about the IRB and the laws.
Respect · 100
0 of 2 deductions are Respect
Respect checks whether the speaker argued with people’s positions and records rather than attacking the people: insults, mockery, or bad motives assigned to them. Criticism of what someone did, however strong, is not marked.
Nothing lost points.
Clarity · 100
0 of 2 deductions are Clarity
Clarity checks for plain speaking, clear ownership of actions, and honest limits on certainty. A low score means vague promises or evasive language.
Nothing lost points.
Claims · 2
This list shows the factual statements you can check for yourself: the words as said, and the claim restated to stand on its own.
1 “Canada Border Services Agency investigates” When a person in Canada is found to have committed a crime, the Canada Border Services Agency investigates that person. search 2 “they could become inadmissible” A person in Canada who has committed a crime could become inadmissible under Canadian immigration law. search
