← Back to the statement
Statement grade
Not graded: fewer than 4 clauses beyond the address. The scores are shown; a grade would say little. Not graded
Signal
100 / 100
View details Viewing ↓
Relevance
48 / 100
View details Viewing ↓
Respect
32 / 100
View details Viewing ↓
Clarity
100 / 100
View details Viewing ↓
A score under 50 is red. Choose a measurement to see where it lost points and why; choose it again to clear.
Claims 100%
Structure · 2 steps
Claims · 2
This view breaks the statement into its steps and names what each one does.
Mr. Chair, Claims · 39 words for the benefit of my colleague, perhaps he does not know that we have established a dedicated express entry category for surgeons, physicians and clinical specialists.1 Mockery The good news is that we have issued 391 invitations to apply already.2 Partly on point
At a glance
Lost points for Partly on point ×2 Mockery Didn't answer None of this reply addressed the specific point raised or the topic under debate.
Switch Claims on to list the checkable claims here.
What the tags mean →
Signal · 100
0 of 3 deductions are Signal
Signal checks whether every part makes a point, gives a reason, or asks for action. A low score means the speaker filled time with fluff, pleasantries, or attacks.
Nothing lost points.
Relevance · 48
2 of 3 deductions are Relevance
Relevance checks whether the speaker stays on topic and answers the question asked. A low score means the speaker dodged the issue. Measured against the point put to the member, and the motion under debate.
Partly on point Staying near the subject without addressing the matter at hand: what was asked, or what the bill, motion or speech is about. What the tags mean → “for the benefit of my colleague, perhaps he does not know that we have established a dedicated express entry category for surgeons, physicians and clinical specialists.” About express entry categories for physicians, not about health benefits for rejected asylum claimants.
Partly on point Staying near the subject without addressing the matter at hand: what was asked, or what the bill, motion or speech is about. What the tags mean → “The good news is that we have issued 391 invitations to apply already.” Gives figures on express entry invitations, not on the question of expanding benefits for rejected claimants.
Respect · 32
1 of 3 deductions are Respect
Respect checks whether the speaker argued with people’s positions and records rather than attacking the people: insults, mockery, or bad motives assigned to them. Criticism of what someone did, however strong, is not marked.
Mockery Mocking a person instead of answering their argument. What the tags mean → “perhaps he does not know” Sarcastically implies the member is ignorant, ridiculing his knowledge rather than his position.
Clarity · 100
0 of 3 deductions are Clarity
Clarity checks for plain speaking, clear ownership of actions, and honest limits on certainty. A low score means vague promises or evasive language.
Nothing lost points.
Claims · 2
This list shows the factual statements you can check for yourself: the words as said, and the claim restated to stand on its own.
1 “we have established a dedicated express entry category for surgeons, physicians and clinical specialists” Canada has established a dedicated Express Entry category for surgeons, physicians and clinical specialists. search 2 “we have issued 391 invitations to apply already” IRCC has issued 391 invitations to apply under the Express Entry category for surgeons, physicians and clinical specialists. search
