← Back to the statement
Statement grade
The average of Signal, Relevance, Respect and Clarity. Average 90 / 100
Signal
100 / 100
View details Viewing ↓
Relevance
60 / 100
View details Viewing ↓
Respect
100 / 100
View details Viewing ↓
Clarity
100 / 100
View details Viewing ↓
A score under 50 is red. Choose a measurement to see where it lost points and why; choose it again to clear.
Claims 75% Reasoning 25%
Structure · 3 steps
Claims · 1
This view breaks the statement into its steps and names what each one does.
Mr. Chair, Claims · 27 words we work with partners in public safety, the RCMP and the CBSA. We have reinforced them. We are hiring 1,000 additional staff.1 We brought in various measures. Partly on point Reasoning · 9 words I think Canadians in the community can feel safe.
At a glance
Lost points for Partly on point ×4
Switch Claims on to list the checkable claims here.
What the tags mean →
Signal · 100
0 of 4 deductions are Signal
Signal checks whether every part makes a point, gives a reason, or asks for action. A low score means the speaker filled time with fluff, pleasantries, or attacks.
Nothing lost points.
Relevance · 60
4 of 4 deductions are Relevance
Relevance checks whether the speaker stays on topic and answers the question asked. A low score means the speaker dodged the issue. Measured against the point put to the member, and the motion under debate.
Partly on point Staying near the subject without addressing the matter at hand: what was asked, or what the bill, motion or speech is about. What the tags mean → “we work with partners in public safety, the RCMP and the CBSA.” About general work with public safety partners, not the confidence asked about unresolved IRGC cases.
Partly on point Staying near the subject without addressing the matter at hand: what was asked, or what the bill, motion or speech is about. What the tags mean → “We have reinforced them.” General reinforcement of enforcement agencies, not the IRGC cases raised.
Partly on point Staying near the subject without addressing the matter at hand: what was asked, or what the bill, motion or speech is about. What the tags mean → “We are hiring 1,000 additional staff.” Hiring plans for enforcement staff, not the unresolved cases asked about.
Partly on point Staying near the subject without addressing the matter at hand: what was asked, or what the bill, motion or speech is about. What the tags mean → “We brought in various measures.” General measures without specifics, not the confidence question about IRGC cases.
Respect · 100
0 of 4 deductions are Respect
Respect checks whether the speaker argued with people’s positions and records rather than attacking the people: insults, mockery, or bad motives assigned to them. Criticism of what someone did, however strong, is not marked.
Nothing lost points.
Clarity · 100
0 of 4 deductions are Clarity
Clarity checks for plain speaking, clear ownership of actions, and honest limits on certainty. A low score means vague promises or evasive language.
Nothing lost points.
Claims · 1
This list shows the factual statements you can check for yourself: the words as said, and the claim restated to stand on its own.
1 “We are hiring 1,000 additional staff.” The government is hiring 1,000 additional staff. search
