Analysis · Debate question · beta

Michelle Rempel Garner

Conservative on Business of Supply 2026-05-28

96 words · 5 sentences · 8 clauses

Statement grade

A+

Average 98 / 100

A score under 50 is red. Choose a measurement to see where it lost points and why; choose it again to clear.

Claims 79%Positioning 4%The question 17%

This view breaks the statement into its steps and names what each one does.

Mr. Chair, Claims · 31 wordsas a lawyer, she should know that what the court ruling actually said was that there was nothing in the charter that gave people these rights, ⁴and my bill was constitutional, Positioning · 4 wordsso shame on her.Insult Claims · 45 wordsShe voted against it.¹ A non-citizen spied on his roommates while they used the bathroom.² The minister is sitting here arguing that it is okay for this person to be in Canada, yet he was given a lenient sentence so that he would avoid deportation.³ The question · 16 wordsCan the minister tell the victims of this disgusting rapist why he is still in Canada?

At a glance

Lost points for
Personal attackThis statement targeted a person rather than their actions or views: “shame on her”.

Switch Claims on to list the checkable claims here.

What the tags mean

Signal · 100

0 of 1 deductions are Signal

Signal checks whether every part makes a point, gives a reason, or asks for action. A low score means the speaker filled time with fluff, pleasantries, or attacks.

Nothing lost points.

Relevance · no score

Not applicable: nothing to answer. Excluded from the average.

Relevance checks whether the speaker stays on topic and answers the question asked. A low score means the speaker dodged the issue.

Respect · 94

1 of 1 deductions are Respect

Respect checks whether the speaker argued with people’s positions and records rather than attacking the people: insults, mockery, or bad motives assigned to them. Criticism of what someone did, however strong, is not marked.

An insult aimed at a person.What the tags mean “shame on her”A personal rebuke aimed at the individual member rather than her argument or record.

Clarity · 100

0 of 1 deductions are Clarity

Clarity checks for plain speaking, clear ownership of actions, and honest limits on certainty. A low score means vague promises or evasive language.

Nothing lost points.

Claims · 4

This list shows the factual statements you can check for yourself: the words as said, and the claim restated to stand on its own.

1“She voted against it”The member the speaker is addressing (a lawyer, named in the wider debate) voted against the speaker’s bill.search
2“A non-citizen spied on his roommates while they used the bathroom”A non-citizen was found to have spied on his roommates while they used the bathroom.search
3“he was given a lenient sentence”The non-citizen in this criminal case was given a lenient sentence.search
4“the court ruling actually said was that there was nothing in the charter that gave people these rights”The court ruling on the speaker’s bill said there was nothing in the charter that gave people these rights.search

Analysed on 2026-10-20