Analysis · Debate reply · beta

Lena Metlege Diab

Liberal on Business of Supply 2026-05-28

46 words · 4 sentences · 6 clauses

Replying to Michelle Rempel Garner (Conservative)

“Mr. Chair, as a lawyer, she should know that what the court ruling actually said was that there was nothing in the charter that gave people these rights, and my bill was constitutional, so shame on her. She voted against it. A non-citizen spied on his roommates while they used the bathroom. The minister is sitting here arguing that it is okay for this person to be in Canada, yet he was given a lenient sentence so that he would avoid deportation. Can the minister tell the victims of this disgusting rapist why he is still in Canada?”

Statement grade

A+

Average 96 / 100

A score under 50 is red. Choose a measurement to see where it lost points and why; choose it again to clear.

Claims 65%Reasoning 20%Promise 15%

This view breaks the statement into its steps and names what each one does.

Mr. Chair, Claims · 11 wordsthe court clearly and unequivocally stated that public safety is paramount, ¹Reasoning · 9 wordsand that is exactly what this government is doing. Claims · 10 wordsWe have hired officers. We are complying with our obligations, Promise · 7 wordsand we will continue to do that.Vague promise Claims · 9 wordsThere is nothing in our law that offers otherwise.

At a glance

Lost points for
AnsweredOf this reply, 100% addressed the question or point raised.

Switch Claims on to list the checkable claims here.

What the tags mean

Signal · 100

0 of 1 deductions are Signal

Signal checks whether every part makes a point, gives a reason, or asks for action. A low score means the speaker filled time with fluff, pleasantries, or attacks.

Nothing lost points.

Relevance · 100

0 of 1 deductions are Relevance

Relevance checks whether the speaker stays on topic and answers the question asked. A low score means the speaker dodged the issue. Measured against the point put to the member, and the motion under debate.

Nothing lost points.

Respect · 100

0 of 1 deductions are Respect

Respect checks whether the speaker argued with people’s positions and records rather than attacking the people: insults, mockery, or bad motives assigned to them. Criticism of what someone did, however strong, is not marked.

Nothing lost points.

Clarity · 83

1 of 1 deductions are Clarity

Clarity checks for plain speaking, clear ownership of actions, and honest limits on certainty. A low score means vague promises or evasive language.

A promise with no date, no measure and no one responsible.What the tags mean “we will continue to do that”A commitment to carry on with no measure, date or success condition named.

Claims · 1

This list shows the factual statements you can check for yourself: the words as said, and the claim restated to stand on its own.

1“the court clearly and unequivocally stated that public safety is paramount”The court ruling referenced in this debate stated that public safety is paramount.search

Analysed on 2026-10-20