“Mr. Speaker, I am thankful for the opportunity to conclude my remarks. I was speaking about not having a national security strategy for Canada to back up the government’s Defence Investment Agency and defence industrial strategy. None of this will work without this key foundation. A procurement architecture cannot be designed for a mission that has never been defined or for threats that have not been assessed. We cannot build an agency to deliver capability to our armed forces when we have not decided what capability Canada actually needs. The Minister of National Defence admitted to me in testimony at committee that no consideration of threat assessments, pre-kinetic warfare, grey zone warfare, cognitive operations or PSYOPS is in the defence investment strategy. How could there be? That would require a foundational national security strategy, a strategy the government does not have. Simply put, the government has put the cart before the horse, and Canadians in uniform will pay the price. Indeed, all of Canada will pay the price. This is the exact opposite of creating a self-reliant and sovereign country. The fancy speeches, the hollow announcements and the promises are all illusions. The reality is that it seems as if the Prime Minister is more focused on building his own defence industry oligarchy. As Conservatives, we have always stood proudly with the women and men who serve in uniform. We ask them to do dangerous things. We ask them to stand between Canadians and harm. We send them to protect our sovereignty, to serve our allies and to represent our country at its best. The very least we owe them is the right equipment, honestly procured without corruption, without patronage and without a $1-billion slush fund that answers to no one. Vancouver Island is home to both CFB Comox and CFB Esquimalt. The families there are watching, the veterans there are watching and the serving members are watching. They are all starting to see behind the curtain of illusion, and the illusion is starting to crumble. We will oppose division 16 of this bill, not because we oppose defence investment, but because we refuse to accept the illusion of it in place of reality. Canada deserves better. Our armed forces deserve better. The people of Cowichan—Malahat—Langford, who live alongside—”
Statement grade
A–
The average of Signal, Relevance, Respect and Clarity.
Average 86 / 100
A score under 50 is red. Choose a measurement to see where it lost points and why; choose it again to clear.
Positioning 19%Claims 79%Procedure 2%
This view breaks the statement into its steps and names what each one does.
Mr. Speaker, Positioning · 15 wordsI cannot believe the member can actually make those statements and keep a straight face.MockeryClaims · 77 wordsUnder the Conservative Party, they actually had just below 1% of GDP going to Canada’s military.1The current Prime Minister, elected just over a year ago, made a commitment to bring it up to 2% of Canada’s GDP.2We accomplished that months after.Before the end of last year, we achieved the 2%.3We provided support, financial pay and so forth, investing in the military and building a military industry.Vague promiseThat is what this government has done.Positioning · 6 wordsWhat did the Conservative government do?PositioningClaims · 10 wordsIt did zip, nothing.In fact, it closed veterans offices.4Off pointProcedure · 2 wordsImagine what—Procedure