“Mr. Speaker, I am thankful for the opportunity to conclude my remarks. I was speaking about not having a national security strategy for Canada to back up the government’s Defence Investment Agency and defence industrial strategy. None of this will work without this key foundation. A procurement architecture cannot be designed for a mission that has never been defined or for threats that have not been assessed. We cannot build an agency to deliver capability to our armed forces when we have not decided what capability Canada actually needs. The Minister of National Defence admitted to me in testimony at committee that no consideration of threat assessments, pre-kinetic warfare, grey zone warfare, cognitive operations or PSYOPS is in the defence investment strategy. How could there be? That would require a foundational national security strategy, a strategy the government does not have. Simply put, the government has put the cart before the horse, and Canadians in uniform will pay the price. Indeed, all of Canada will pay the price. This is the exact opposite of creating a self-reliant and sovereign country. The fancy speeches, the hollow announcements and the promises are all illusions. The reality is that it seems as if the Prime Minister is more focused on building his own defence industry oligarchy. As Conservatives, we have always stood proudly with the women and men who serve in uniform. We ask them to do dangerous things. We ask them to stand between Canadians and harm. We send them to protect our sovereignty, to serve our allies and to represent our country at its best. The very least we owe them is the right equipment, honestly procured without corruption, without patronage and without a $1-billion slush fund that answers to no one. Vancouver Island is home to both CFB Comox and CFB Esquimalt. The families there are watching, the veterans there are watching and the serving members are watching. They are all starting to see behind the curtain of illusion, and the illusion is starting to crumble. We will oppose division 16 of this bill, not because we oppose defence investment, but because we refuse to accept the illusion of it in place of reality. Canada deserves better. Our armed forces deserve better. The people of Cowichan—Malahat—Langford, who live alongside—”
Statement grade
B
The average of Signal, Relevance, Respect and Clarity.
Average 77 / 100
A score under 50 is red. Choose a measurement to see where it lost points and why; choose it again to clear.
Positioning 52%Claims 48%
This view breaks the statement into its steps and names what each one does.
Mr. Speaker, Positioning · 24 wordsI would reinforce where the Conservative Party is probably at its weakest.Partly on pointThe member tried to paint a picture that is just not true.PositioningClaims · 38 wordsAt the end of the day, I would compare our investments in the Canadian Forces to the Conservatives’ when his leader was a member of government for 10 years.They actually dipped just below 1% of Canada’s GDP.1Positioning · 14 wordsIt is truly amazing that the member would try to give this false impression, PositioningClaims · 19 wordsas if the Conservatives actually supported the Canadian Forces, when in fact they cut nine offices from Veterans Affairs.2Off pointPositioning · 24 wordsIt is delusional that the member is able to make the statements that he has.MockeryWhy does he not stick straight to the facts?PositioningPartly on point