Analysis · Debate reply · beta

Kevin Lamoureux

158 words · 8 sentences · 13 clauses

Replying to Doug Eyolfson (Liberal)
“Mr. Speaker, we hear the phrase “Government should get out of the way.” Whenever I hear that phrase, I think that someone has been reading a little too much Ayn Rand. I would like to ask the hon. member this: In the face of the punishing tariffs from the United States, what would be happening to Canadian businesses if government got out of the way?”
Statement grade
C
64 / 100, held down by Relevance
A score under 50 is red. Choose a measurement to see where it lost points and why; choose it again to clear.
Promise 54%Reasoning 6%Claims 33%Procedure 8%

This view breaks the statement into its steps and names what each one does.

Mr. Speaker, Promise · 22 wordswhether it is the Prime Minister, the government, or any member of the Liberal caucus, that is something we will not do, Vague promiseReasoning · 9 wordsbecause we understand the significance of the Canada-U.S.A. relationship. Claims · 19 wordsBillions of dollars cross our borders every day.1 The relationship between Canada and the United States is well rooted, Partly on pointProcedure · 12 wordsbut there is something that is really important for us to recognize: ProcedureClaims · 5 wordsCanada is a sovereign nation.2 Promise · 6 wordsWe are not going to capitulate, Partly on pointVague promiseClaims · 12 wordsas the Conservatives were proposing yesterday, on our arts programs in Canada.3Off point Promise · 41 wordsWe are going to continue to recognize that if it is going to take time, we are prepared not only to take the time but also to put the resources and energy into ensuring that Canada gets the best deal possible.Partly on pointVague promise Claims · 16 wordsOn Trump version one, what we found was there was an abandonment by the Conservative Party.4 Promise · 16 wordsWe are not going to do that.Off point We are going to persist at getting that deal.Partly on pointVague promise

Analysed on