← Back to the statement
Statement grade
The average of Signal, Relevance, Respect and Clarity is 78. The grade is held to 75, 30 above Relevance. 75 / 100, held down by Relevance
Signal
91 / 100
View details Viewing ↓
Relevance
45 / 100
View details Viewing ↓
Respect
77 / 100
View details Viewing ↓
Clarity
100 / 100
View details Viewing ↓
A score under 50 is red. Choose a measurement to see where it lost points and why; choose it again to clear.
Claims 75% Positioning 25%
Structure · 6 steps
Claims · 3
This view breaks the statement into its steps and names what each one does.
Madam Speaker, Claims · 55 words we have a steel mill in Regina as well, InterPro Pipe and Steel.1 It employs a lot of people, 3 so steel is very important to us. The Prime Minister should have kept his word. He was the one who could deal with Donald Trump. He promised to get a deal done by July 1, 2025.2 Positioning · 3 words He misled Canadians, Insult Claims · 7 words and he cannot get the deal done, Positioning · 26 words because he is all talk and no action. Positioning The biggest disappointment I have with the Liberal government is the fact that the Prime Minister misled Canadians. Insult Claims · 25 words He said he would get a deal done with Donald Trump. He said he could handle him. He did not get any of that done. Partly on point
At a glance
Lost points for Partly on point ×13 Insult ×2 Positioning Didn't answer None of this reply addressed the specific point raised or the topic under debate. Personal attack This statement targeted a person rather than their actions or views: “He misled Canadians”.
Switch Claims on to list the checkable claims here.
What the tags mean →
Signal · 91
1 of 16 deductions are Signal
Signal checks whether every part makes a point, gives a reason, or asks for action. A low score means the speaker filled time with fluff, pleasantries, or attacks.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “because he is all talk and no action.” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Relevance · 45
13 of 16 deductions are Relevance
Relevance checks whether the speaker stays on topic and answers the question asked. A low score means the speaker dodged the issue. Measured against the point put to the member, and the bill under debate.
Partly on point Staying near the subject without addressing the matter at hand: what was asked, or what the bill, motion or speech is about. What the tags mean → “we have a steel mill in Regina as well, InterPro Pipe and Steel.” About a steel mill in the member’s own city, not what the Conservatives would do about the tariffs.
Partly on point Staying near the subject without addressing the matter at hand: what was asked, or what the bill, motion or speech is about. What the tags mean → “It employs a lot of people,” About employment at a local mill, not a response to the proposed wage subsidy or tariff relief.
Partly on point Staying near the subject without addressing the matter at hand: what was asked, or what the bill, motion or speech is about. What the tags mean → “so steel is very important to us.” About the importance of steel generally, not the measures asked about.
Partly on point Staying near the subject without addressing the matter at hand: what was asked, or what the bill, motion or speech is about. What the tags mean → “The Prime Minister should have kept his word.” About the Prime Minister’s word on a trade deal, not the tariff relief measures asked about.
Partly on point Staying near the subject without addressing the matter at hand: what was asked, or what the bill, motion or speech is about. What the tags mean → “He was the one who could deal with Donald Trump.” About who could deal with Donald Trump, not the question’s proposed remedy or Conservative action.
Partly on point Staying near the subject without addressing the matter at hand: what was asked, or what the bill, motion or speech is about. What the tags mean → “He promised to get a deal done by July 1, 2025.” About a past promise on a trade deal, not what the Conservatives would do for affected sectors.
Partly on point Staying near the subject without addressing the matter at hand: what was asked, or what the bill, motion or speech is about. What the tags mean → “He misled Canadians,” An accusation about misleading Canadians, not a response on tariffs or the wage subsidy.
Partly on point Staying near the subject without addressing the matter at hand: what was asked, or what the bill, motion or speech is about. What the tags mean → “and he cannot get the deal done,” About the Prime Minister not getting a deal, not the tariff relief asked about.
Partly on point Staying near the subject without addressing the matter at hand: what was asked, or what the bill, motion or speech is about. What the tags mean → “because he is all talk and no action.” A criticism of the Prime Minister, not an answer on measures for affected steel and aluminum sectors.
Partly on point Staying near the subject without addressing the matter at hand: what was asked, or what the bill, motion or speech is about. What the tags mean → “The biggest disappointment I have with the Liberal government is the fact that the Prime Minister misled Canadians.” About disappointment in the government’s conduct, not the tariff question put to the member.
Partly on point Staying near the subject without addressing the matter at hand: what was asked, or what the bill, motion or speech is about. What the tags mean → “He said he would get a deal done with Donald Trump.” About a past commitment on a trade deal, not the question’s proposal or Conservative policy.
Partly on point Staying near the subject without addressing the matter at hand: what was asked, or what the bill, motion or speech is about. What the tags mean → “He said he could handle him.” About a prior claim about handling Donald Trump, not the tariff relief asked about.
Partly on point Staying near the subject without addressing the matter at hand: what was asked, or what the bill, motion or speech is about. What the tags mean → “He did not get any of that done.” About the deal not being done, not what the Conservatives would do for affected sectors.
Respect · 77
2 of 16 deductions are Respect
Respect checks whether the speaker argued with people’s positions and records rather than attacking the people: insults, mockery, or bad motives assigned to them. Criticism of what someone did, however strong, is not marked.
Insult An insult aimed at a person. What the tags mean → “He misled Canadians” It attributes personal dishonesty to the Prime Minister himself, going beyond saying a promise was not kept.
Insult An insult aimed at a person. What the tags mean → “the Prime Minister misled Canadians” It again charges the named Prime Minister personally with deceiving Canadians, a claim about his character rather than his performance.
Clarity · 100
0 of 16 deductions are Clarity
Clarity checks for plain speaking, clear ownership of actions, and honest limits on certainty. A low score means vague promises or evasive language.
Nothing lost points.
Claims · 3
This list shows the factual statements you can check for yourself: the words as said, and the claim restated to stand on its own.
1 “we have a steel mill in Regina as well, InterPro Pipe and Steel” There is a steel mill in Regina called InterPro Pipe and Steel. search 2 “He promised to get a deal done by July 1, 2025” The Prime Minister promised to get a trade deal done with Donald Trump by July 1, 2025. search 3 “It employs a lot of people” InterPro Pipe and Steel in Regina employs a lot of people. search
