Analysis · Debate reply · beta

Jessica Fancy

110 words · 5 sentences · 7 clauses

Replying to Serge Cormier (Liberal)
“Mr. Speaker, and I just want to thank my colleague for her speech. It is wonderful to work with her. She is a new colleague. She is doing great work. I know how good she is. She is representing a rural riding just like me. In the last spring economic statement, there was $1 billion for small craft harbours, and I know that she was a big part of this investment. She was talking about some of the amendments that are in this bill, and she was talked about mining. I had a lot of mining industry in my region back in the day, but it has closed. There were 2,000 people laid off at a mine in my region back in 2013. Now with these new amendments that are being putting forward and this new process, we see new mine projects coming into play. Can the member tell us if amendments like that would also help her riding with new projects of this kind?”
Statement grade
C+
67 / 100, held down by Relevance
A score under 50 is red. Choose a measurement to see where it lost points and why; choose it again to clear.
Thanks 10%Claims 60%Procedure 30%

This view breaks the statement into its steps and names what each one does.

Mr. Speaker, Thanks · 11 wordsI really want to thank my colleague from Bathurst for that.Thanks Claims · 21 wordsOn Thursday, there will be an announcement.1Partly on pointHidden agency I will be at the AGM for one of the Nova Scotia mining associations.Off point Procedure · 33 wordsWith regard to what some of the mining associations are saying about our federal budget update, I would like to read into the record the following quote from the Mining Association of Canada: ProcedureClaims · 45 wordsMAC applauds today’s federal budget, 2which contains many measures that will enhance the competitiveness of Canadian mining and accelerate investments in critical minerals.3 Budget 2025 responds directly to several requests from the Mining Association of Canada and follows through on a number of mining-related commitments—4Partly on point

Analysed on