Analysis · Debate reply · beta

Blake Richards

222 words · 12 sentences · 13 clauses

Replying to Sean Casey (Liberal)
“Madam Speaker, Oxford University Press chose the word of the year in 2025. That word was “rage bait”, and that speech was exhibit A. When the member claims there has been $4.2 billion cut from the Veterans Affairs budget, he knows better. He knows that the $4.2 billion is an actuarial calculation that simply states the present value of a future obligation for medical cannabis, which is now being reimbursed to veterans at the market rate. There are no cutbacks. The same amount of cannabis is being distributed, only now the price that is being paid is the market rate. That is what is reflected in the $4 billion. Rage baiting is when one takes that and misconstrues it into something they know full well it is not. Is the member ready now to stand up and acknowledge that is in fact the case and stop the rage baiting?”
Statement grade
B–
71 / 100, held down by Signal
A score under 50 is red. Choose a measurement to see where it lost points and why; choose it again to clear.
Positioning 50%The question 14%Claims 36%

This view breaks the statement into its steps and names what each one does.

Madam Speaker, Positioning · 35 wordsI would be ashamed of myself if I was to stand and ask a question like that. I understand the role that the parliamentary secretary plays to defend a Prime Minister who is indefensible, frankly.PositioningOff point The question · 30 wordsHowever, when he stands up and tries to tell us that $4 billion is for cuts to cannabis, how much cannabis are the Liberals planning on handing out to veterans? Positioning · 9 wordsThat is a heck of a lot of cannabis.Positioning Claims · 57 wordsAnother thing we are hearing from veterans in long-term care is that they are being shortchanged. We hear from RCMP veterans who are having their pensions reduced. We hear about cuts to the bureau of pension advocates, which is the group that helps veterans get their benefits when they are denied by the government far too often.1 Positioning · 6 wordsThese are the kinds of impacts.Positioning Claims · 23 wordsThe BPA cuts alone will mean five-year wait times for veterans to finally get the benefits they have worked so hard to deserve.Partly on point Positioning · 62 wordsHow can the member stand up and try to pretend that somehow we are manufacturing this? I guess all Canadians, veterans and everyone else who is crying about all of these horrible cuts are all rage baiting too, apparently. However, I will tell members right now that it is the government that is mistaken and it will pay the price for it.Positioning

Analysed on