← Back to the statement
Statement grade
The average of Signal, Relevance, Respect and Clarity is 57. The grade is held to 34, 30 above Relevance.
34 / 100, held down by Relevance
Signal
36 / 100
View details Viewing ↓
Relevance
4 / 100
View details Viewing ↓
Respect
100 / 100
View details Viewing ↓
Clarity
87 / 100
View details Viewing ↓
A score under 50 is red. Choose a measurement to see where it lost points and why; choose it again to clear.
Thanks 10% Procedure 7% Positioning 41% Claims 41%
Structure · 12 steps
Claims · 5
This view breaks the statement into its steps and names what each one does.
Mr. Speaker, Thanks · 16 words I always appreciate the comments by my colleague from Winnipeg North, even if they are wrong. Thanks Procedure · 3 words The problem is, Procedure Positioning · 4 words where are the results? Positioning Claims · 52 words People are asking for real results. Partly on point I am sure the member remembers well the campaign promise by the leader of the Liberal Party 15 months ago.1 He said it would be elbows up and he told America we would be strong again.2 When he got elected, he went to the White House.3 Positioning · 20 words What did he do? It was far from elbows up. He was humble. What did he do a week ago? Positioning Claims · 5 words He went to New York.4 Positioning · 4 words What did he say? Positioning Claims · 8 words He said we will make America great again.5 Positioning · 4 words Who can believe it? Positioning Off point Procedure · 8 words This is the truth. Unearned certainty This is the reality. Procedure Unearned certainty Positioning · 33 words Imagine if a Conservative had said that in New York. Those guys would have been in a nuclear war against us. The truth is that this country needs real effects and real results— Positioning Off point Unearned certainty
At a glance
Lost points for Off point ×14 Positioning ×10 Procedure ×3 Unearned certainty ×3 Partly on point ×2 Thanks
Didn't answer None of this reply addressed the specific point raised or the topic under debate.
Little substance Much of this statement went to praise, blame, greetings, routine procedure or general stories rather than reasons, requests or specific points.
Switch Claims on to list the checkable claims here.
What the tags mean →
Signal · 36
14 of 33 deductions are Signal
Signal checks whether every part makes a point, gives a reason, or asks for action. A low score means the speaker filled time with fluff, pleasantries, or attacks.
Thanks Thanks and tributes. What the tags mean → “I always appreciate the comments by my colleague from Winnipeg North, even if they are wrong.” Thanks: no claim, reason or ask.
Procedure Throat-clearing: announcing what you are about to say, or the House’s routine business. What the tags mean → “The problem is,” Procedure or throat-clearing: no claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “where are the results?” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “What did he do?” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “It was far from elbows up.” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “He was humble.” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “What did he do a week ago?” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “What did he say?” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “Who can believe it?” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Procedure Throat-clearing: announcing what you are about to say, or the House’s routine business. What the tags mean → “This is the truth.” Procedure or throat-clearing: no claim, reason or ask.
Procedure Throat-clearing: announcing what you are about to say, or the House’s routine business. What the tags mean → “This is the reality.” Procedure or throat-clearing: no claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “Imagine if a Conservative had said that in New York.” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “Those guys would have been in a nuclear war against us.” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “The truth is that this country needs real effects and real results—” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Relevance · 4
16 of 33 deductions are Relevance
Relevance checks whether the speaker stays on topic and answers the question asked. A low score means the speaker dodged the issue. Measured against the point put to the member, and the motion under debate.
Partly on point Staying near the subject without addressing the matter at hand: what was asked, or what the bill, motion or speech is about. What the tags mean → “where are the results?” It asks about results generally without touching the recession claim or the trade and energy record raised in the question.
Partly on point Staying near the subject without addressing the matter at hand: what was asked, or what the bill, motion or speech is about. What the tags mean → “People are asking for real results.” It speaks of results generally, not the recession claim or the trade and energy points in the question.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “I am sure the member remembers well the campaign promise by the leader of the Liberal Party 15 months ago.” It is about the Prime Minister’s campaign promise, not the recession claim or the trade and energy record raised in the question.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “He said it would be elbows up and he told America we would be strong again.” It concerns the Prime Minister’s campaign rhetoric toward America, not the recession or trade and energy points put.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “When he got elected, he went to the White House.” It recounts the Prime Minister’s visit to the White House, not the recession claim or the trade and energy points in the question.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “What did he do?” It is a rhetorical question about the White House visit, not about the recession or the trade and energy record raised.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “It was far from elbows up.” It is about the Prime Minister’s conduct at the White House, not the recession claim or the trade and energy points put.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “He was humble.” It describes the Prime Minister’s manner at the White House, not the recession or the trade and energy record in the question.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “What did he do a week ago?” It asks about the Prime Minister’s recent trip, not the recession claim or the trade and energy points raised.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “He went to New York.” It is about the Prime Minister’s trip to New York, not the recession or the trade and energy points in the question.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “What did he say?” It is a rhetorical question about what was said in New York, not about the recession or trade and energy record.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “He said we will make America great again.” It is about a remark the Prime Minister made in New York, not the recession claim or the trade and energy points put.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “Who can believe it?” It is a rhetorical expression of doubt about the Prime Minister’s remark, not about the recession or trade and energy record.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “Imagine if a Conservative had said that in New York.” It is a hypothetical about how a Conservative would be treated, not the recession or the trade and energy points put.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “Those guys would have been in a nuclear war against us.” It is a rhetorical jab about how the other side would react, not the recession claim or the trade and energy record.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “The truth is that this country needs real effects and real results—” It calls for real results generally without addressing the recession claim or the trade and energy points raised.
Respect · 100
0 of 33 deductions are Respect
Respect checks whether the speaker argued with people’s positions and records rather than attacking the people: insults, mockery, or bad motives assigned to them. Criticism of what someone did, however strong, is not marked.
Nothing lost points.
Clarity · 87
3 of 33 deductions are Clarity
Clarity checks for plain speaking, clear ownership of actions, and honest limits on certainty. A low score means vague promises or evasive language.
Unearned certainty Something stated as certain with nothing to back it. What the tags mean → “This is the truth” Asserts truth in place of any source for what was said.
Unearned certainty Something stated as certain with nothing to back it. What the tags mean → “This is the reality” The formula asserts certainty rather than citing anything checkable.
Unearned certainty Something stated as certain with nothing to back it. What the tags mean → “The truth is” A certainty formula standing in for a source.
Claims · 5
This list shows the factual statements you can check for yourself: the words as said, and the claim restated to stand on its own.
1 “the campaign promise by the leader of the Liberal Party 15 months ago” The leader of the Liberal Party made a campaign promise about 15 months before June 2026. search
2 “elbows up” The Liberal Party leader used the phrase ‘elbows up’ during the 2025 federal election campaign. search
3 “When he got elected, he went to the White House” After being elected Prime Minister in 2025, Mark Carney visited the White House. search
4 “He went to New York” About a week before June 2, 2026, Prime Minister Mark Carney travelled to New York. search
5 “we will make America great again” Speaking in New York in late May 2026, Prime Minister Mark Carney said ‘we will make America great again’. search