Claims 60% Positioning 31% Procedure 4% The ask 3% Anecdote 2%
Structure · 31 steps
Claims · 5
This view breaks the statement into its steps and names what each one does.
Mr. Speaker, Claims · 120 words this is literally what the response was that I got from AI about the motion. Word for word, it said, “This motion is built for maximum rhetorical punch, not factual or analytical strength. The motion collapses complex economic indicators into a simplistic, worse-than-the-G7 narrative, cherry-picks metrics without context and demands an impossible remedy that has no coherent policy meaning.” I hear my friend from Saskatchewan across the way criticizing AI. I would remind him to tread lightly in this area, given the fact that I am pretty certain at least 70% to 80% of the questions asked during question period by the Conservatives are generated by AI, before he goes down that path of trying to be critical of it. Positioning · 16 words I can understand why he does not like listening to what was generated as a response, Positioning Claims · 8 words but it is the reality of the situation. Unearned certainty Positioning · 45 words The real irony is not that AI spit out the obvious and what everybody already knows. Unearned certainty What it really comes down to is that this is exactly what Canadians are feeling right now in watching the Leader of the Opposition’s response to what has happened. Positioning Off point Claims · 124 words Let us just take ourselves back to Friday morning when Statistics Canada released information that we were in a technical recession by a declining growth of, listen to this, negative 0.03%.1 We are talking about a really small percentage. The Leader of the Opposition jumped on this news like it was the biggest gift he has ever received. He was so gleeful about it. He gathered whoever he could from his caucus who remained here on a Friday; Partly on point they usually disappear halfway through question period on a Thursday. Off point He dragged them out in front of this building, lined them up behind himself at 9:30 a.m. and gave a press conference with a gigantic smile on his face. He was so excited by this news. Positioning · 29 words Imagine being a member of this House, one of the 343 members, let alone the Leader of the Opposition, 2 and taking such joy in knowing that Canadians are suffering? Positioning Claims · 8 words That is exactly what we saw from him. Partly on point Procedure · 14 words That is not even where it ended, because it got even worse than that. Procedure Claims · 88 words Rightly so, a reporter from The Hill Times asked the Leader of the Opposition, on the topic of the economy, “Might you be going a little too far with this by suggesting that this is a massive, colossal economic situation?” The Leader of the Opposition, the member for Battle River—Crowfoot, started laughing at the reporter and said, “Of course you are making excuses for the Prime Minister.3 What outlet are you from?” The reporter said The Hill Times, and the Conservative leader said, “Oh, yeah, The Hill Times.” Positioning · 30 words What I find so utterly amazing is that Conservatives, much less the Leader of the Opposition, are unable to recognize that their strategy may have been really effective in 2024, Positioning Claims · 33 words but with everything going on in the world right now, with the way that the U.S. is positioning itself against us right now and is treating us like an economic enemy at times, Off point Positioning · 87 words and with the sense of incredible pride that Canadians have in wanting to stick together and fight this together, the Conservatives still think that it is a winning strategy to talk down Canadians, to talk down the Prime Minister and to talk down the position we are in. Partly on point I can wonder all day long about why the Conservatives think this is an effective strategy, why they are doing this and why they have not realized that their 2024 tactics are just falling on deaf ears right now. Positioning Off point Procedure · 26 words People do not even have to listen to me. They do not even have to consider the fact that I am bringing this to their attention. Procedure Claims · 75 words They can just look at the fact that it is reflected in the polling. It is reflected in the decision in the last election.4 Canadians do not want the Conservatives. They do not want that rhetoric. They do not want that style of approach. They do not want a Leader of the Opposition who is going to laugh at reporters, challenge what outlet they are with and then dismiss them. Canadians do not want that. The ask · 38 words I really wish that my colleagues across the way, who keep heckling me right now, would take a moment to reflect on the fact that maybe there is a little bit of truth to what I am saying. Positioning · 43 words Maybe the Canadian people would like to see humility and would like to see a Leader of the Opposition who actually takes the time to reflect on the world that people live in and does not jump at an opportunity to celebrate it, Positioning Off point Claims · 20 words so that he can say “I told him so” to the Prime Minister on what amounts to a statistical error. Partly on point Motive imputed An hon. member: Oh, oh! Hon. Mark Gerretsen: Procedure · 11 words Mr. Speaker, it is negative 0.03% of growth. I am sorry. Procedure Positioning · 31 words It is catastrophic. Look at them. They are doing it right now. They absolutely refuse. Off point They want to make this the biggest, boldest and absolutely worst thing that could possibly happen. Positioning Claims · 42 words That is the narrative they are going with. Partly on point I am actually not surprised, because they are just parroting what their leader did on Friday. He went outside this building, Off point and he took the opportunity to celebrate the position that Canada was in. Partly on point Positioning · 12 words Conservatives can keep doing this. They can do it all day long, Positioning Claims · 31 words but I am telling them right now that this is not selling to the Canadian public. The Canadian public is not buying this. By the way, the Conservatives did this before. Positioning · 54 words What situation did they set up for themselves? Their approach, always, is not asking what they are going to do to improve the lives of Canadians. Their approach is to make the other guy look bad, attack the other guy and beat him or her into submission so that they look like the champions. Positioning Off point Procedure · 2 words Guess what? Procedure Claims · 46 words They tried that in 2024. To a certain degree, they were kind of effective at it, but it did not materialize into their forming government, did it? It did not. They just ended up coming right back. It certainly did not result in Conservatives forming government.5 Off point Positioning · 24 words The key thing they are missing is that, rather than just attack, attack, attack, they have to provide solutions. They have to provide alternatives. Positioning Partly on point Claims · 21 words I have said this so many times in the House. I am actually trying to give them political advice right now. Anecdote · 23 words People back in my war room are probably asking why I will not shut up, because I am telling them what to do, Anecdote Claims · 100 words but it is true. I am just trying to help them because I feel like they really, genuinely need it. The reality is that Conservatives are going to keep doing this over and over and over. Unearned certainty It is not going to produce anything for them because the reality of the situation is that Canadians are looking for parliamentarians, especially in the world that we live in right now, to work together, to collaborate together, to come up with ideas together and certainly not to celebrate potential downfalls, Off point Unearned certainty which is what the Leader of the Opposition and his caucus are doing. Partly on point
At a glance
Lost points for Off point ×48 Positioning ×21 Partly on point ×16 Procedure ×7 Unearned certainty ×4 Anecdote ×2 Motive imputed
Personal attack This statement targeted a person rather than their actions or views: “so that he can say “I told him so” to the Prime Minister”.
Switch Claims on to list the checkable claims here.
What the tags mean →
Signal · 57
30 of 99 deductions are Signal
Signal checks whether every part makes a point, gives a reason, or asks for action. A low score means the speaker filled time with fluff, pleasantries, or attacks.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “I can understand why he does not like listening to what was generated as a response,” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “The real irony is not that AI spit out the obvious and what everybody already knows.” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “What it really comes down to is that this is exactly what Canadians are feeling right now in watching the Leader of the Opposition’s response to what has happened.” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “Imagine being a member of this House, one of the 343 members, let alone the Leader of the Opposition,” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “and taking such joy in knowing that Canadians are suffering?” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Procedure Throat-clearing: announcing what you are about to say, or the House’s routine business. What the tags mean → “That is not even where it ended,” Procedure or throat-clearing: no claim, reason or ask.
Procedure Throat-clearing: announcing what you are about to say, or the House’s routine business. What the tags mean → “because it got even worse than that.” Procedure or throat-clearing: no claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “What I find so utterly amazing is that Conservatives, much less the Leader of the Opposition, are unable to recognize that their strategy may have been really effective in 2024,” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “and with the sense of incredible pride that Canadians have in wanting to stick together and fight this together, the Conservatives still think that it is a winning strategy to talk down Canadians, to talk down the Prime Minister and to talk down the position we are in.” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “I can wonder all day long about why the Conservatives think this is an effective strategy, why they are doing this and why they have not realized that their 2024 tactics are just falling on deaf ears right now.” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Procedure Throat-clearing: announcing what you are about to say, or the House’s routine business. What the tags mean → “People do not even have to listen to me.” Procedure or throat-clearing: no claim, reason or ask.
Procedure Throat-clearing: announcing what you are about to say, or the House’s routine business. What the tags mean → “They do not even have to consider the fact that I am bringing this to their attention.” Procedure or throat-clearing: no claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “Maybe the Canadian people would like to see humility and would like to see a Leader of the Opposition who actually takes the time to reflect on the world that people live in and does not jump at an opportunity to celebrate it,” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Procedure Throat-clearing: announcing what you are about to say, or the House’s routine business. What the tags mean → “Mr. Speaker, it is negative 0.03% of growth.” Procedure or throat-clearing: no claim, reason or ask.
Procedure Throat-clearing: announcing what you are about to say, or the House’s routine business. What the tags mean → “I am sorry.” Procedure or throat-clearing: no claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “It is catastrophic.” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “Look at them.” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “They are doing it right now.” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “They absolutely refuse.” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “They want to make this the biggest, boldest and absolutely worst thing that could possibly happen.” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “Conservatives can keep doing this.” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “They can do it all day long,” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “What situation did they set up for themselves?” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “Their approach, always, is not asking what they are going to do to improve the lives of Canadians.” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “Their approach is to make the other guy look bad, attack the other guy and beat him or her into submission so that they look like the champions.” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Procedure Throat-clearing: announcing what you are about to say, or the House’s routine business. What the tags mean → “Guess what?” Procedure or throat-clearing: no claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “The key thing they are missing is that, rather than just attack, attack, attack, they have to provide solutions.” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “They have to provide alternatives.” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Anecdote A story that illustrates instead of making a point. What the tags mean → “People back in my war room are probably asking why I will not shut up,” An anecdote: it illustrates, it does not claim, reason or ask.
Anecdote A story that illustrates instead of making a point. What the tags mean → “because I am telling them what to do,” An anecdote: it illustrates, it does not claim, reason or ask.
Relevance · 26
64 of 99 deductions are Relevance
Relevance checks whether the speaker stays on topic and answers the question asked. A low score means the speaker dodged the issue. Measured against the motion under debate.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “The real irony is not that AI spit out the obvious and what everybody already knows.” About the AI-generated remark and what everyone knows, not the economy or the motion’s claims.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “What it really comes down to is that this is exactly what Canadians are feeling right now in watching the Leader of the Opposition’s response to what has happened.” About the Leader of the Opposition’s response, not the motion’s economic claims or demanded plan.
Partly on point Staying near the subject without addressing the matter at hand: what was asked, or what the bill, motion or speech is about. What the tags mean → “The Leader of the Opposition jumped on this news like it was the biggest gift he has ever received.” About the Leader of the Opposition’s reaction to the recession news, not the motion’s claims or its demanded plan.
Partly on point Staying near the subject without addressing the matter at hand: what was asked, or what the bill, motion or speech is about. What the tags mean → “He was so gleeful about it.” Describes the Leader of the Opposition’s demeanour over the recession news, not the motion’s substance.
Partly on point Staying near the subject without addressing the matter at hand: what was asked, or what the bill, motion or speech is about. What the tags mean → “He gathered whoever he could from his caucus who remained here on a Friday;” About the caucus gathering for the press conference, not the motion’s economic claims or plan.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “they usually disappear halfway through question period on a Thursday.” About members’ attendance earlier in the week, not the economy or the motion.
Partly on point Staying near the subject without addressing the matter at hand: what was asked, or what the bill, motion or speech is about. What the tags mean → “He dragged them out in front of this building, lined them up behind himself at 9:30 a.m. and gave a press conference with a gigantic smile on his face.” Describes the press conference staging and manner, not the motion’s claims or demanded plan.
Partly on point Staying near the subject without addressing the matter at hand: what was asked, or what the bill, motion or speech is about. What the tags mean → “He was so excited by this news.” About the Leader of the Opposition’s reaction to the news, not the motion’s substance.
Partly on point Staying near the subject without addressing the matter at hand: what was asked, or what the bill, motion or speech is about. What the tags mean → “Imagine being a member of this House, one of the 343 members, let alone the Leader of the Opposition,” About members’ attitude toward the recession news, not the motion’s claims or plan.
Partly on point Staying near the subject without addressing the matter at hand: what was asked, or what the bill, motion or speech is about. What the tags mean → “and taking such joy in knowing that Canadians are suffering?” About taking joy in the recession news, not the motion’s economic claims or demanded plan.
Partly on point Staying near the subject without addressing the matter at hand: what was asked, or what the bill, motion or speech is about. What the tags mean → “That is exactly what we saw from him.” About the Leader of the Opposition’s conduct over the news, not the motion’s substance.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “Rightly so, a reporter from The Hill Times asked the Leader of the Opposition, on the topic of the economy, “Might you be going a little too far with this by suggesting that this is a massive, colossal economic situation?”” About a reporter’s question to the Leader of the Opposition, not the motion’s claims or plan.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “The Leader of the Opposition, the member for Battle River—Crowfoot, started laughing at the reporter and said, “Of course you are making excuses for the Prime Minister.” About the Leader of the Opposition’s reply to a reporter, not the motion’s economic substance.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “What outlet are you from?”” About the exchange with the reporter, not the economy or the motion.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “The reporter said The Hill Times,” About the reporter’s outlet, not the motion’s subject.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “and the Conservative leader said, “Oh, yeah, The Hill Times.”” Continues the reporter exchange, unrelated to the motion’s claims or plan.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “What I find so utterly amazing is that Conservatives, much less the Leader of the Opposition, are unable to recognize that their strategy may have been really effective in 2024,” About the Conservatives’ strategy, not the motion’s economic claims or demanded plan.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “but with everything going on in the world right now, with the way that the U.S. is positioning itself against us right now and is treating us like an economic enemy at times,” About the Conservatives’ political strategy and world conditions, not the motion’s claims or plan.
Partly on point Staying near the subject without addressing the matter at hand: what was asked, or what the bill, motion or speech is about. What the tags mean → “and with the sense of incredible pride that Canadians have in wanting to stick together and fight this together, the Conservatives still think that it is a winning strategy to talk down Canadians, to talk down the Prime Minister and to talk down the position we are in.” Touches U.S. economic treatment of Canada in passing while criticizing the Conservatives’ strategy.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “I can wonder all day long about why the Conservatives think this is an effective strategy, why they are doing this and why they have not realized that their 2024 tactics are just falling on deaf ears right now.” About why the Conservatives pursue their strategy, not the motion’s substance.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “They can just look at the fact that it is reflected in the polling.” About polling of the parties, not the motion’s economic claims or demanded plan.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “It is reflected in the decision in the last election.” About the last election result, not the motion’s substance.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “Canadians do not want the Conservatives.” About voters’ view of the Conservatives, not the economy or the motion.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “They do not want that rhetoric.” About the Conservatives’ rhetoric, not the motion’s economic claims or plan.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “They do not want that style of approach.” About the Conservatives’ style of approach, not the motion’s substance.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “They do not want a Leader of the Opposition who is going to laugh at reporters, challenge what outlet they are with and then dismiss them.” About the Leader of the Opposition’s conduct with a reporter, not the motion.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “Canadians do not want that.” About voters’ view of the Conservatives’ conduct, not the motion’s claims or plan.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “I really wish that my colleagues across the way, who keep heckling me right now, would take a moment to reflect on the fact that maybe there is a little bit of truth to what I am saying.” Addressed to heckling members, not the motion’s claims or demanded plan.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “Maybe the Canadian people would like to see humility and would like to see a Leader of the Opposition who actually takes the time to reflect on the world that people live in and does not jump at an opportunity to celebrate it,” About the humility the opposition leader should show, not the motion’s economic substance.
Partly on point Staying near the subject without addressing the matter at hand: what was asked, or what the bill, motion or speech is about. What the tags mean → “so that he can say “I told him so” to the Prime Minister on what amounts to a statistical error.” Touches the statistical nature of the recession figure while focusing on the opposition leader’s motives.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “Look at them.” Addressed to the members’ behaviour in the chamber, not the motion.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “They are doing it right now.” About the members’ conduct at that moment, not the motion’s substance.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “They absolutely refuse.” About the members’ refusal in the exchange, not the motion’s claims or plan.
Partly on point Staying near the subject without addressing the matter at hand: what was asked, or what the bill, motion or speech is about. What the tags mean → “They want to make this the biggest, boldest and absolutely worst thing that could possibly happen.” About the Conservatives’ exaggeration of the news rather than the motion’s claims or its demanded plan.
Partly on point Staying near the subject without addressing the matter at hand: what was asked, or what the bill, motion or speech is about. What the tags mean → “That is the narrative they are going with.” Characterizes the Conservatives’ narrative without addressing the motion’s economic claims or plan.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “I am actually not surprised,” About the speaker’s lack of surprise at the Conservatives, not the motion.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “because they are just parroting what their leader did on Friday.” About Conservatives copying their leader, not the motion’s economic substance.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “He went outside this building,” About where the leader held his event, not the motion’s claims or plan.
Partly on point Staying near the subject without addressing the matter at hand: what was asked, or what the bill, motion or speech is about. What the tags mean → “and he took the opportunity to celebrate the position that Canada was in.” About the leader celebrating the country’s position rather than the motion’s claims or demanded plan.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “Conservatives can keep doing this.” About whether the Conservatives continue their tactics, not the motion’s substance.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “They can do it all day long,” About the Conservatives persisting, not the motion’s economic claims or plan.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “but I am telling them right now that this is not selling to the Canadian public.” About the public reception of the Conservatives’ tactics, not the motion.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “The Canadian public is not buying this.” About the public not accepting the Conservatives’ message, not the motion’s substance.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “By the way, the Conservatives did this before.” About the Conservatives’ past conduct, not the motion’s economic claims or demanded plan.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “What situation did they set up for themselves?” About the situation the Conservatives created for themselves, not the motion.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “Their approach, always, is not asking what they are going to do to improve the lives of Canadians.” About the Conservatives’ political approach, not the motion’s claims or plan.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “Their approach is to make the other guy look bad, attack the other guy and beat him or her into submission so that they look like the champions.” About the Conservatives’ attack strategy, not the motion’s economic substance.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “They tried that in 2024.” About the Conservatives’ 2024 efforts, not the motion’s claims or plan.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “To a certain degree, they were kind of effective at it,” About the effectiveness of the Conservatives’ tactics, not the motion.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “but it did not materialize into their forming government, did it?” About the election outcome, not the motion’s economic claims or demanded plan.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “It did not.” Confirms the election point, not the motion’s substance.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “They just ended up coming right back.” About the Conservatives’ return, not the motion’s claims or plan.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “It certainly did not result in Conservatives forming government.” Repeats the election outcome point, not the motion’s substance.
Partly on point Staying near the subject without addressing the matter at hand: what was asked, or what the bill, motion or speech is about. What the tags mean → “The key thing they are missing is that, rather than just attack, attack, attack, they have to provide solutions.” Urges the Conservatives to offer solutions rather than addressing the motion’s demand of the Prime Minister.
Partly on point Staying near the subject without addressing the matter at hand: what was asked, or what the bill, motion or speech is about. What the tags mean → “They have to provide alternatives.” About alternatives the Conservatives should offer, not the motion’s claims or its demand on the Prime Minister.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “I have said this so many times in the House.” About the speaker’s past statements, not the motion’s substance.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “I am actually trying to give them political advice right now.” About the political advice being given, not the motion.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “People back in my war room are probably asking why I will not shut up,” A jocular aside about the speaker’s staff, not the motion’s subject.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “because I am telling them what to do,” About the advice being given to the Conservatives, not the motion’s claims or plan.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “but it is true.” A brief aside affirming the advice, not the motion’s substance.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “I am just trying to help them because I feel like they really, genuinely need it.” About helping the Conservatives, not the motion’s economic claims or demanded plan.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “The reality is that Conservatives are going to keep doing this over and over and over.” About the Conservatives repeating their tactics, not the motion’s claims or plan.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “It is not going to produce anything for them because the reality of the situation is that Canadians are looking for parliamentarians, especially in the world that we live in right now, to work together, to collaborate together, to come up with ideas together and certainly not to celebrate potential downfalls,” About parliamentarians working together generally, not the motion’s specific claims or demanded plan.
Partly on point Staying near the subject without addressing the matter at hand: what was asked, or what the bill, motion or speech is about. What the tags mean → “which is what the Leader of the Opposition and his caucus are doing.” About the opposition celebrating downturns rather than the motion’s economic claims or demanded plan.
Respect · 98
1 of 99 deductions are Respect
Respect checks whether the speaker argued with people’s positions and records rather than attacking the people: insults, mockery, or bad motives assigned to them. Criticism of what someone did, however strong, is not marked.
Motive imputed Claiming to know a person’s bad motives. What the tags mean → “so that he can say “I told him so” to the Prime Minister” Attributes a self-serving motive for his conduct to the Leader of the Opposition as fact.
Clarity · 89
4 of 99 deductions are Clarity
Clarity checks for plain speaking, clear ownership of actions, and honest limits on certainty. A low score means vague promises or evasive language.
Unearned certainty Something stated as certain with nothing to back it. What the tags mean → “it is the reality of the situation” Asserts a situation as fact in place of any source.
Unearned certainty Something stated as certain with nothing to back it. What the tags mean → “what everybody already knows” Replaces evidence with an appeal to universal knowledge.
Unearned certainty Something stated as certain with nothing to back it. What the tags mean → “The reality is” Asserts a claim about others’ future conduct as plain reality without a source.
Unearned certainty Something stated as certain with nothing to back it. What the tags mean → “the reality of the situation is” Asserts what Canadians want as established reality with no source.
Claims · 5
This list shows the factual statements you can check for yourself: the words as said, and the claim restated to stand on its own.
1 “Let us just take ourselves back to Friday morning when Statistics Canada released information that we were in a technical recession by a declining growth of, listen to this, negative 0.03%.” Statistics Canada released data on the Friday before the debate (2026-05-29) showing negative 0.03% growth, described by the speaker as a technical recession. search
2 “one of the 343 members” The House of Commons has 343 members. search
3 “The Leader of the Opposition, the member for Battle River—Crowfoot, started laughing at the reporter and said, “Of course you are making excuses for the Prime Minister.” The Leader of the Opposition (member for Battle River—Crowfoot) responded to a Hill Times reporter’s question about the economy by saying the reporter was making excuses for the Prime Minister and asking what outlet he was from. search
4 “the decision in the last election” In the most recent federal election Canadians did not elect a Conservative government. search
5 “It certainly did not result in Conservatives forming government” The Conservatives did not form government in the most recent federal election. search