Analysis · Debate reply · beta

Mark Gerretsen

84 words · 2 sentences · 4 clauses

Replying to Gord Johns (NDP). The question was off topic, so this reply is judged against the motion.
“Mr. Speaker, the member talked about AI, which I want to talk about. We know that Canadians right now are facing rising costs and economic uncertainty. Financial fraud is even becoming a greater threat, and it is not being talked enough about today. Organized crime is using AI-generated scams for deepfakes, spoof calls and fake investment schemes to target people already under financial pressure. A record amount of fraud is impacting seniors in my riding who are losing their life savings. Families are being defrauded, and victims are often left to recover on their own. Protecting Canadians requires urgent government intervention: blocking scam calls, holding financial institutions and digital platforms accountable, ensuring that victims have access to support and recovery services, and growing the scale and urgency of this problem at a time when every dollar counts. When will the Liberals finally combat fraud using the measures they have, as a key tool in protecting Canadians’ financial security and economic well-being?”
Statement grade
B–
73 / 100, held down by Relevance
A score under 50 is red. Choose a measurement to see where it lost points and why; choose it again to clear.
Claims 100%

This view breaks the statement into its steps and names what each one does.

Mr. Speaker, Claims · 84 wordsit is obvious that this is something the government takes extremely seriously.Unearned certainty This is the first government to have a Minister of Artificial Intelligence who is directly overseeing how we can safely implement artificial intelligence, 1which is inevitably going to make its way through society, Off pointand how we can safely do that in a way that protects Canadians but still sees the maximum potential that can come from this technology, including when that potential uses the opportunity to critique opposition motions from the Conservatives.

Analysed on