← Back to the statement
Statement grade
The average of Signal, Respect and Clarity. Average 92 / 100
Signal
75 / 100
View details Viewing ↓
Relevance
–
Not scored Viewing ↓
Respect
100 / 100
View details Viewing ↓
Clarity
100 / 100
View details Viewing ↓
A score under 50 is red. Choose a measurement to see where it lost points and why; choose it again to clear.
Claims 79% Positioning 12% Procedure 6% The question 2%
Structure · 5 steps
Claims · 5
This view breaks the statement into its steps and names what each one does.
Mr. Speaker, Claims · 98 words yesterday, the Prime Minister delivered a speech on anti-Semitism so neutered that an anti-Semite would have given it a standing ovation. His solution was a council that includes a lawyer who went to court defending illegal encampments and a former minister whose organization lost federal funding for supporting Hamas and Hezbollah and who then lobbied the former government to keep them off the terror list.1 2 3 The council is led now by a minister who wants to ban passages from the Bible and funded these same anti-Semites in his own department.4 5 Jewish Canadians are being attacked on the streets, Positioning · 15 words and the Liberals are giving the keys to the very people that fuelled the crisis. Positioning Procedure · 8 words I have one question for the Prime Minister: Procedure The question · 3 words Is he serious?
At a glance
Lost points for Positioning Procedure
Switch Claims on to list the checkable claims here.
What the tags mean →
Signal · 75
2 of 2 deductions are Signal
Signal checks whether every part makes a point, gives a reason, or asks for action. A low score means the speaker filled time with fluff, pleasantries, or attacks.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “and the Liberals are giving the keys to the very people that fuelled the crisis.” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Procedure Throat-clearing: announcing what you are about to say, or the House’s routine business. What the tags mean → “I have one question for the Prime Minister:” Procedure or throat-clearing: no claim, reason or ask.
Relevance · no score
Not applicable: nothing to answer. Excluded from the average.
Relevance checks whether the speaker stays on topic and answers the question asked. A low score means the speaker dodged the issue.
Respect · 100
0 of 2 deductions are Respect
Respect checks whether the speaker argued with people’s positions and records rather than attacking the people: insults, mockery, or bad motives assigned to them. Criticism of what someone did, however strong, is not marked.
Nothing lost points.
Clarity · 100
0 of 2 deductions are Clarity
Clarity checks for plain speaking, clear ownership of actions, and honest limits on certainty. A low score means vague promises or evasive language.
Nothing lost points.
Claims · 5
This list shows the factual statements you can check for yourself: the words as said, and the claim restated to stand on its own.
1 “a lawyer who went to court defending illegal encampments” A lawyer included in the Prime Minister’s anti-Semitism council went to court defending illegal encampments. search 2 “a former minister whose organization lost federal funding for supporting Hamas and Hezbollah” A former minister’s organization lost federal funding for supporting Hamas and Hezbollah. search 3 “who then lobbied the former government to keep them off the terror list” That former minister lobbied the former government to keep Hamas and Hezbollah off the terror list. search 4 “a minister who wants to ban passages from the Bible” The minister leading the council has said he wants to ban passages from the Bible. search 5 “funded these same anti-Semites in his own department” The minister leading the council funded the organizations referenced in his own department. search
