← Back to the statement
Statement grade
The average of Signal, Respect and Clarity. Average 68 / 100
Signal
57 / 100
View details Viewing ↓
Relevance
–
Not scored Viewing ↓
Respect
48 / 100
View details Viewing ↓
Clarity
100 / 100
View details Viewing ↓
A score under 50 is red. Choose a measurement to see where it lost points and why; choose it again to clear.
Procedure 37% Claims 42% The question 21%
Structure · 4 steps
Claims · 2
This view breaks the statement into its steps and names what each one does.
Mr. Speaker, Procedure · 35 words the question was for the Prime Minister. I asked if he would stand in this House and condemn the forced labour practices by the regime in Beijing being carried out on people in Xinjiang province.1 Procedure Claims · 40 words I know this is a tough issue for him because his company in China is seeking to expand its business. Motive imputed His company took a $200-million loan from a Chinese state-backed bank, 2 so he does not want to compromise those interests. Motive imputed The question · 20 words Will he put people before profits, and stand up today and condemn forced labour in Xinjiang province, yes or no?
At a glance
Lost points for Procedure ×2 Motive imputed ×2 Personal attack This statement targeted a person rather than their actions or views: “tough issue for him because his company in China is seeking to expand its business”.
Switch Claims on to list the checkable claims here.
What the tags mean →
Signal · 57
2 of 4 deductions are Signal
Signal checks whether every part makes a point, gives a reason, or asks for action. A low score means the speaker filled time with fluff, pleasantries, or attacks.
Procedure Throat-clearing: announcing what you are about to say, or the House’s routine business. What the tags mean → “the question was for the Prime Minister.” Procedure or throat-clearing: no claim, reason or ask.
Procedure Throat-clearing: announcing what you are about to say, or the House’s routine business. What the tags mean → “I asked if he would stand in this House and condemn the forced labour practices by the regime in Beijing being carried out on people in Xinjiang province.” Procedure or throat-clearing: no claim, reason or ask.
Relevance · no score
Not applicable: nothing to answer. Excluded from the average.
Relevance checks whether the speaker stays on topic and answers the question asked. A low score means the speaker dodged the issue.
Respect · 48
2 of 4 deductions are Respect
Respect checks whether the speaker argued with people’s positions and records rather than attacking the people: insults, mockery, or bad motives assigned to them. Criticism of what someone did, however strong, is not marked.
Motive imputed Claiming to know a person’s bad motives. What the tags mean → “tough issue for him because his company in China is seeking to expand its business” It attributes a personal financial motive as the reason he finds the issue difficult.
Motive imputed Claiming to know a person’s bad motives. What the tags mean → “so he does not want to compromise those interests” It asserts a hidden personal financial interest driving his refusal, stated as fact.
Clarity · 100
0 of 4 deductions are Clarity
Clarity checks for plain speaking, clear ownership of actions, and honest limits on certainty. A low score means vague promises or evasive language.
Nothing lost points.
Claims · 2
This list shows the factual statements you can check for yourself: the words as said, and the claim restated to stand on its own.
1 “I asked if he would stand in this House and condemn the forced labour practices by the regime in Beijing being carried out on people in Xinjiang province” In Question Period on June 3, 2026, Pierre Poilievre asked the Prime Minister to condemn forced labour practices by the Beijing regime against people in Xinjiang province. search 2 “His company took a $200-million loan from a Chinese state-backed bank” The Prime Minister’s company received a $200-million loan from a Chinese state-backed bank. search
