Analysis · Question Period question · beta

Pierre Poilievre

Conservative on International Trade 2026-06-03

111 words · 4 sentences · 7 clauses

Statement grade

B+

Average 80 / 100

A score under 50 is red. Choose a measurement to see where it lost points and why; choose it again to clear.

Claims 61%Procedure 8%The ask 4%The question 27%

This view breaks the statement into its steps and names what each one does.

Mr. Speaker, Claims · 68 wordsthe Prime Minister refuses to stand up and condemn the forced labour in Xinjiang province because, of course, he does not want to jeopardize his corporate profits, in which he is continually invested, even though they come at the expense of Canadian workers.¹²Motive imputed Canadian workers lose out when they have to compete with forced labour, and Canadian workers lose out when there are punitive tariffs as a result. Procedure · 9 wordsI will give the Prime Minister one last chance: ProcedureThe ask · 4 wordsPut people before profit. The question · 30 wordsWill the Prime Minister stand up and announce that he is going to ban shipments of any goods from Xinjiang province, ³which is renowned for forced labour, yes or no?

At a glance

Lost points for
Personal attackThis statement targeted a person rather than their actions or views: “he does not want to jeopardize his corporate profits, in which he is continually invested”.

Switch Claims on to list the checkable claims here.

What the tags mean

Signal · 88

1 of 2 deductions are Signal

Signal checks whether every part makes a point, gives a reason, or asks for action. A low score means the speaker filled time with fluff, pleasantries, or attacks.

Throat-clearing: announcing what you are about to say, or the House’s routine business.What the tags mean “I will give the Prime Minister one last chance:”Procedure or throat-clearing: no claim, reason or ask.

Relevance · no score

Not applicable: nothing to answer. Excluded from the average.

Relevance checks whether the speaker stays on topic and answers the question asked. A low score means the speaker dodged the issue.

Respect · 51

1 of 2 deductions are Respect

Respect checks whether the speaker argued with people’s positions and records rather than attacking the people: insults, mockery, or bad motives assigned to them. Criticism of what someone did, however strong, is not marked.

Claiming to know a person’s bad motives.What the tags mean “he does not want to jeopardize his corporate profits, in which he is continually invested”It attributes a hidden financial motive for silence directly to the Prime Minister as fact.

Clarity · 100

0 of 2 deductions are Clarity

Clarity checks for plain speaking, clear ownership of actions, and honest limits on certainty. A low score means vague promises or evasive language.

Nothing lost points.

Claims · 3

This list shows the factual statements you can check for yourself: the words as said, and the claim restated to stand on its own.

1“refuses to stand up and condemn the forced labour in Xinjiang province”The Prime Minister has not condemned the forced labour in Xinjiang province.search
2“his corporate profits, in which he is continually invested”The Prime Minister holds ongoing investments in corporate holdings.search
3“Will the Prime Minister stand up and announce that he is going to ban shipments of any goods from Xinjiang province, ”Xinjiang province is known for forced labour.search

Analysed on 2026-10-20