Analysis · Debate reply · beta

Leah Gazan

NDP on Government Orders 2026-06-03

128 words · 5 sentences · 6 clauses

Replying to Jenny Kwan (NDP)

“Mr. Speaker, my colleague raised a number of very important points and amendments that should have been considered but were not, at the committee. I wonder, because she was running out of time to finish her comments, if she could further elaborate on some other issues that she thinks members of Parliament should hear.”

Statement grade

A+

Average 96 / 100

A score under 50 is red. Choose a measurement to see where it lost points and why; choose it again to clear.

Procedure 4%Claims 90%Positioning 6%

This view breaks the statement into its steps and names what each one does.

Mr. Speaker, Procedure · 5 wordsI was talking about deepfakes.Procedure Claims · 115 wordsIn spite of the fact that the minister responsible for AI has been asked by several womens organizations and by people impacted by deepfakes, the government has voted to support media giants such as Elon Musk in programs such as Grok.³ I would like to note that this is a problem under the purview of the minister of AI, who has failed completely to address the widespread concerns and fears of folks across Canada about the social media consequences of AI. In March of this year, I requested information on the Order Paper question concerning meetings the minister has taken with stakeholders impacted by AI, ¹and I learned that he has taken absolutely zero meetings.² Positioning · 8 wordsInstead, the Liberals have been more concerned with—Positioning

At a glance

Lost points for
AnsweredOf this reply, 100% addressed the question or point raised.

Switch Claims on to list the checkable claims here.

What the tags mean

Signal · 86

2 of 2 deductions are Signal

Signal checks whether every part makes a point, gives a reason, or asks for action. A low score means the speaker filled time with fluff, pleasantries, or attacks.

Throat-clearing: announcing what you are about to say, or the House’s routine business.What the tags mean “I was talking about deepfakes.”Procedure or throat-clearing: no claim, reason or ask.
Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it.What the tags mean “Instead, the Liberals have been more concerned with—”Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.

Relevance · 100

0 of 2 deductions are Relevance

Relevance checks whether the speaker stays on topic and answers the question asked. A low score means the speaker dodged the issue. Measured against the point put to the member, and the bill under debate.

Nothing lost points.

Respect · 100

0 of 2 deductions are Respect

Respect checks whether the speaker argued with people’s positions and records rather than attacking the people: insults, mockery, or bad motives assigned to them. Criticism of what someone did, however strong, is not marked.

Nothing lost points.

Clarity · 100

0 of 2 deductions are Clarity

Clarity checks for plain speaking, clear ownership of actions, and honest limits on certainty. A low score means vague promises or evasive language.

Nothing lost points.

Claims · 3

This list shows the factual statements you can check for yourself: the words as said, and the claim restated to stand on its own.

1“In March of this year, I requested information on the Order Paper question concerning meetings the minister has taken with stakeholders impacted by AI”In March 2026, Leah Gazan tabled an Order Paper question asking about meetings the minister responsible for AI has taken with stakeholders impacted by AI.search
2“he has taken absolutely zero meetings”The minister responsible for AI reported zero meetings with stakeholders impacted by AI, according to the response to Leah Gazan’s March 2026 Order Paper question.search
3“the government has voted to support media giants such as Elon Musk in programs such as Grok”The government has voted in a way that supports media giants such as Elon Musk in programs such as Grok.search

Analysed on 2026-10-20