“Mr. Speaker, I was at the same meeting the member referred to, the heart-on-our-sleeve meeting with victims. I heard their gut-wrenching stories and witnessed their bravery in sharing their stories, so I wanted to ask this question: Why did the government vote against excluding child sexual offences from the safety valve? If mandatory minimum penalties can be ignored, what exactly is mandatory about them?”
Statement grade
A–
The average of Signal, Relevance, Respect and Clarity.
Average 85 / 100
A score under 50 is red. Choose a measurement to see where it lost points and why; choose it again to clear.
Claims 25%Reasoning 55%Positioning 20%
This view breaks the statement into its steps and names what each one does.
Mr. Speaker, Claims · 22 wordsI remember that when I first heard about mandatory minimums, under former prime minister Harper, I thought they were a great idea.Partly on pointReasoning · 49 wordsHowever, what is the use of bringing forward laws that are just going to get thrown out because there is the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms that the government has to respect?1We have to use more than our heart on our sleeve when we are crafting legislation.Positioning · 18 wordsWhen someone is on this side of the House, they have to take that responsibility much more seriously.PositioningPartly on point