Analysis · Question Period answer · beta

Sean Fraser

Liberal on Justice 2026-06-04

125 words · 4 sentences · 5 clauses

Replying to Larry Brock (Conservative)

“Mr. Speaker, Canadians are sick and tired of watching violent criminals get chance after chance while victims pay the price. A non-citizen committed multiple violent crimes in 2019. Seven years later, he is still in Canada. He carried out two robberies at gunpoint and pistol-whipped another victim, yet somehow, these Liberals keep protecting him from deportation. We Conservatives fought to end sentencing discounts for serious criminals. They voted against it. Why is avoiding deportation more important than protecting Canadians from violent criminals?”

Statement grade

76 / 100, held down by Relevance

A score under 50 is red. Choose a measurement to see where it lost points and why; choose it again to clear.

Positioning 31%Claims 50%Reasoning 19%

This view breaks the statement into its steps and names what each one does.

Mr. Speaker, Positioning · 39 wordsit is difficult to take seriously charges of not taking crime seriously with harms falling to victims from a member who, just a few hours ago, was opposing efforts to speed up the adoption of the protecting victims act.¹PositioningOff point Claims · 62 wordsWe have launched one of the most ambitious agendas when it comes to criminal law reform, when it comes to bail reform, when it comes to strengthening sentencing, and when it comes to protecting victims and combatting hate.Partly on point With respect to the issue that the member mentioned, he knows there is no rule that requires sentences to be adjusted for immigration status.² Reasoning · 24 wordsWe support the decisions of the Supreme Court of Canada and trust the judiciary to implement the law with fit sentences, independent of politics.

At a glance

Lost points for

Switch Claims on to list the checkable claims here.

What the tags mean

Signal · 61

1 of 4 deductions are Signal

Signal checks whether every part makes a point, gives a reason, or asks for action. A low score means the speaker filled time with fluff, pleasantries, or attacks.

Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it.What the tags mean “it is difficult to take seriously charges of not taking crime seriously with harms falling to victims from a member who, just a few hours ago, was opposing efforts to speed up the adoption of the protecting victims act.”Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.

Relevance · 46

3 of 4 deductions are Relevance

Relevance checks whether the speaker stays on topic and answers the question asked. A low score means the speaker dodged the issue. Measured against the question asked.

Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate.What the tags mean “it is difficult to take seriously charges of not taking crime seriously with harms falling to victims from a member who, just a few hours ago, was opposing efforts to speed up the adoption of the protecting victims act.”Attacks the questioner’s conduct earlier that day instead of addressing the deportation question.
Staying near the subject without addressing the matter at hand: what was asked, or what the bill, motion or speech is about.What the tags mean “We have launched one of the most ambitious agendas when it comes to criminal law reform, when it comes to bail reform, when it comes to strengthening sentencing,”Lists the government’s criminal law agenda without addressing the deportation case asked about.
Staying near the subject without addressing the matter at hand: what was asked, or what the bill, motion or speech is about.What the tags mean “and when it comes to protecting victims and combatting hate.”Adds more items from the government’s own agenda, not an answer on the deportation question.

Respect · 100

0 of 4 deductions are Respect

Respect checks whether the speaker argued with people’s positions and records rather than attacking the people: insults, mockery, or bad motives assigned to them. Criticism of what someone did, however strong, is not marked.

Nothing lost points.

Clarity · 100

0 of 4 deductions are Clarity

Clarity checks for plain speaking, clear ownership of actions, and honest limits on certainty. A low score means vague promises or evasive language.

Nothing lost points.

Claims · 2

This list shows the factual statements you can check for yourself: the words as said, and the claim restated to stand on its own.

1“just a few hours ago, was opposing efforts to speed up the adoption of the protecting victims act”On June 4, 2026, Larry Brock opposed efforts to speed up the adoption of the protecting victims act in the House.search
2“there is no rule that requires sentences to be adjusted for immigration status”No rule in Canadian law requires criminal sentences to be adjusted for a offender’s immigration status.search

Analysed on 2026-10-20