Analysis · Question Period answer · beta

Adam van Koeverden

Liberal on Artificial Intelligence 2026-06-04

90 words · 6 sentences · 8 clauses

Replying to Elizabeth May (Green)

“Mr. Speaker, I wonder how the slogan “AI for all” lands in Tumbler Ridge— Mr. Speaker, children’s lives could have been saved if we had better protection. I am wondering, despite the benefits of AI, why does this strategy land with more promotion than protection? When will the Prime Minister and the government consider the advice of Pope Leo XIV that AI needs to be “disarmed”?”

Statement grade

A+

Average 96 / 100

A score under 50 is red. Choose a measurement to see where it lost points and why; choose it again to clear.

Claims 96%Reasoning 4%

This view breaks the statement into its steps and names what each one does.

Mr. Speaker, Claims · 38 wordsI want to emphasize that trust is at the core of every aspect of our AI strategy. This government is taking a multipronged approach. Bill C‑16 would combat those sexualized deepfakes that are concerning for so many Canadians, ¹Reasoning · 4 wordsas they should be. Claims · 48 wordsBill C‑25 would protect our democratic institutions.² Our strategy commits to bringing forward legislation on safe social media and updating consumer privacy law to protect Canadians’ data.³ We are launching a Canada trusted AI certification program, ⁴and we are protecting Canadians as our first priority in this strategy.Vague promise

At a glance

Lost points for
AnsweredOf this answer, 100% addressed the question that was asked.

Switch Claims on to list the checkable claims here.

What the tags mean

Signal · 100

0 of 1 deductions are Signal

Signal checks whether every part makes a point, gives a reason, or asks for action. A low score means the speaker filled time with fluff, pleasantries, or attacks.

Nothing lost points.

Relevance · 100

0 of 1 deductions are Relevance

Relevance checks whether the speaker stays on topic and answers the question asked. A low score means the speaker dodged the issue. Measured against the question asked.

Nothing lost points.

Respect · 100

0 of 1 deductions are Respect

Respect checks whether the speaker argued with people’s positions and records rather than attacking the people: insults, mockery, or bad motives assigned to them. Criticism of what someone did, however strong, is not marked.

Nothing lost points.

Clarity · 82

1 of 1 deductions are Clarity

Clarity checks for plain speaking, clear ownership of actions, and honest limits on certainty. A low score means vague promises or evasive language.

A promise with no date, no measure and no one responsible.What the tags mean “we are protecting Canadians as our first priority”A commitment to protecting Canadians with no actor beyond ‘we’, no measure, date or way to check success.

Claims · 4

This list shows the factual statements you can check for yourself: the words as said, and the claim restated to stand on its own.

1“Bill C‑16 would combat those sexualized deepfakes”Bill C-16 would combat sexualized deepfakes.search
2“Bill C‑25 would protect our democratic institutions”Bill C-25 would protect Canada’s democratic institutions.search
3“Our strategy commits to bringing forward legislation on safe social media and updating consumer privacy law”The government’s AI strategy commits to bringing forward legislation on safe social media and to updating consumer privacy law.search
4“We are launching a Canada trusted AI certification program”The government is launching a Canada trusted AI certification program.search

Analysed on 2026-10-20