“Madam Speaker, Bill C‑16 makes certain amendments to the Firearms Act. The bill “amends the Firearms Act to clarify that an individual whose firearms licence or registration certificate has been revoked is required to deliver their firearm”. Furthermore, no individual is eligible to hold a licence if it is suspected that they “may have engaged in an act of domestic violence or stalking.” We know that the Conservatives are generally opposed to the idea of any form of gun control. Does my colleague think this amendment to the bill is reasonable?”
Statement grade
B
The average of Signal, Relevance, Respect and Clarity is 87. The grade is held to 78, 30 above Relevance.
78 / 100, held down by Relevance
A score under 50 is red. Choose a measurement to see where it lost points and why; choose it again to clear.
Reasoning 59%Claims 41%
This view breaks the statement into its steps and names what each one does.
Madam Speaker, Reasoning · 5 wordsit could have been stronger.Claims · 21 wordsThere were even amendments talking about crimes committed with firearms.The Liberal government, through committee majority, voted them down as well.1Reasoning · 25 wordsAll I am saying is the amendments that were rejected could have made this bill so much stronger, including the amendments that dealt with firearms.Partly on point
